U.S. Code » Title 7 » Chapter CHAPTER 50— AGRICULTURAL CREDIT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IV— ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

7 U.S.C. § 1982

Relief for mobilized military reservists from certain agricultural loan obligations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Definition of mobilized military reservistIn this section, the term “mobilized military reservist” means an individual who—(1) is on active duty under section 688, 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, 12306, or 12406, or chapter 13 of title 10, or any other provision of law during a war or during a national emergency declared by the President or Congress, regardless of the location at which the active duty service is performed; or(2) in the case of a member of the National Guard, is on full-time National Guard duty (as defined in section 101(d)(5) of title 10) under a call to active service authorized by the President or the Secretary of Defense for a period of more than 30 consecutive days under section 502(f) of title 32 for purposes of responding to a national emergency declared by the President and supported by Federal funds.(b) Forgiveness of interest payments due while borrower is a mobilized military reservist

Any requirement that a borrower of a direct loan made under this chapter make any interest payment on the loan that would otherwise be required to be made while the borrower is a mobilized military reservist is rescinded.

(c) Deferral of principal payments due while or after borrower is a mobilized military reservist

The due date of any payment of principal on a direct loan made to a borrower under this chapter that would otherwise be required to be made while or after the borrower is a mobilized military reservist is deferred for a period equal in length to the period for which the borrower is a mobilized military reservist.

(d) Nonaccrual of interest

Interest on a direct loan made to a borrower described in this section shall not accrue during the period the borrower is a mobilized military reservist.

(e) Borrower not considered to be delinquent or receiving debt forgiveness

Notwithstanding section 2008h of this title or any other provision of this chapter, a borrower who receives assistance under this section shall not, as a result of the assistance, be considered to be delinquent or receiving debt forgiveness for purposes of receiving a direct or guaranteed loan under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, § 332, as added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, § 664, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1974; amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XII, § 1204(a)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2017.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (b), (c), and (e), was in the original “this title”, meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.

Prior Provisions

A prior section 1982, Pub. L. 87–128, title III, § 332, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 314; Pub. L. 99–198, title XIII, § 1311, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1524; Pub. L. 100–233, title VI, § 607, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1667; Pub. L. 101–624, title XVIII, § 1809, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3820; Pub. L. 102–554, § 11, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4151, related to county committees, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–354, title II, § 227(b)(1), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3218.

Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted “chapter 13” for “chapter 15”.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1987–1989 · leading case: Hedge v. Lyng, 689 F. Supp. 884 (D. Minnesota 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hedge v. Lyng, 689 F. Supp. 884 (D. Minnesota 1987). · cites it 3× “7 U.S.C. § 1982 (amended 1985). Under the Food Security Act of 1985, Pub.”
Hanson v. United States, 13 Cl. Ct. 519 (Ct. Cl. 1987). · cites it 3× “7 U.S.C. §§ 1982 , 1983 (1981); 7 C.F.R. §§ 1800.”
Cummings v. United States, 17 Cl. Ct. 475 (Ct. Cl. 1989). “Established by the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act of 1961 (at 7 U.S.C. § 1982 (1976)), County Committees each consist of three local residents who are charged with certifying the eligibility of FmHA applicants.”
Sullivan v. Farmers Home Admin., 691 F. Supp. 927 (E.D.N.C. 1987). · cites it 5× “Plaintiffs challenge the May 22, 1986, FmHA regulations and the June 30, 1986, elections as illegal, arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”); as contrary to the intent and purpose of the Food Security Act…”
Hedge v. Lyng, 689 F. Supp. 877 (D. Minnesota 1987). · cites it 3× “7 U.S.C. § 1982 (amended 1985). Under the Food Security Act of 1985, Pub.”
Hedge v. Lyng, 689 F. Supp. 898 (D. Minnesota 1988). · cites it 3× “7 U.S. C. § 1982 (amended 1985). Under the Food Security Act of 1985, Pub.”
Hedge v. Lyng, 689 F. Supp. 912 (D. Minnesota 1988). · cites it 3× “See 7 U.S.C. § 1982 (a)(1) (1988). The basic duties of each county committee are set out by statute and FmHA regulations.”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1982(a) — 3 cases
Hedge v. Lyng, 689 F. Supp. 884 (D. Minnesota 1987). “7 U.S.C. § 1982 (amended 1985). Under the Food Security Act of 1985, Pub.”
Hedge v. Lyng, 689 F. Supp. 877 (D. Minnesota 1987). “7 U.S.C. § 1982 (amended 1985). Under the Food Security Act of 1985, Pub.”
Hedge v. Lyng, 689 F. Supp. 898 (D. Minnesota 1988). “7 U.S. C. § 1982 (amended 1985). Under the Food Security Act of 1985, Pub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.