7 U.S.C. § 253
Public information
(a) In generalThe Secretary may release to the public the names, addresses, and locations of all persons—(1) that have been licensed under this chapter or that have been approved to engage in an activity under this chapter; and(2) with respect to which a license or approval has been suspended or revoked under section 252 of this title, the results of any investigation made or hearing conducted under this chapter, including the reasons for the suspension or revocation.(b) ConfidentialityExcept as otherwise provided by law, an officer, employee, or agent of the Department shall not divulge confidential business information obtained during a warehouse examination or other function performed as part of the duties of the officer, employee, or agent under this chapter.
(Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, § 14, as added Pub. L. 106–472, title II, § 201, Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2068.)Editorial NotesPrior ProvisionsA prior section 253, acts Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, § 12, 39 Stat. 487; Feb. 23, 1923, ch. 106, 42 Stat. 1283; Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 366, § 7, 46 Stat. 1464, related to suspension and revocation of license to classify, grade, or weigh, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–472. See section 252 of this title.
A prior section 14 of act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, was classified to section 255 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–472.
Notes of Decisions
Iowa Tel. Ass'n v. City of Hawarden, 589 N.W.2d 245 (Iowa 1999).
“The Telecommunications Act of 1996 reads in pertinent part: (a) In general *252 No State or local statute or regulation, or other State or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate…”
— 7 U.S.C. § 253(a) — 1 case
Iowa Tel. Ass'n v. City of Hawarden, 589 N.W.2d 245 (Iowa 1999).
“The Telecommunications Act of 1996 reads in pertinent part: (a) In general *252 No State or local statute or regulation, or other State or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.