7 U.S.C. § 301
Land grant aid of colleges
There is granted to the several States, for the purposes hereinafter mentioned in this subchapter, an amount of public land, to be apportioned to each State a quantity equal to thirty thousand acres for each Senator and Representative in Congress to which the States are respectively entitled by the apportionment under the census of 1860: Provided, That no mineral lands shall be selected or purchased under the provisions of said sections.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1933–2020 · leading case: Knight v. State of Ala., 787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Ala. 1991).
Knight v. State of Ala., 787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Ala. 1991). “, 7 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., 40 which was designed to foster the development, in each state, of at least one college where the leading object shall be, without excluding other scientific and classical studies and including military tactics, to teach such branches of learning as are…”
Heaton v. Bristol, 317 S.W.2d 86 (Tex. App. 1958). “Appellees contend and the trial court found in effect that by accepting the benefits of the Land Grant Act (Acts July 2, 1862, Chapter 130, as amended, Act March 3, 1883, Chapter 102, 7 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq.) the State thereby assumed the obligation to permit the enrollment of…”
Kosydar v. Wolman, 353 F. Supp. 744 (S.D. Ohio 1972). “This is apparent from the face of Article III of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which provided that: Religion, morality, and knowledge being necessary to good government and the iiappiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged. This policy,…”
B.K. ex rel. Kroupa v. 4-H, 877 F. Supp. 2d 804 (D.S.D. 2012). “7 U.S.C. § 301 . South Dakota agreed “to all the provisions of and the “terms and conditions” associated with the land grant act.”
Benner v. Oswald, 444 F. Supp. 545 (M.D. Penn. 1978). “Therefore, Penn State argues that because of its historic commitment to both agriculture and industrial goals, it is entitled to give members of agricultural and industrial societies a voice in the operation of the university to the exclusion of other interested groups.”
Benner v. Oswald, 592 F.2d 174 (3rd Cir. 1979). “7 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. Under the Act, Congress provided land and other assistance for state universities that taught both agriculture and mechanical arts, provided that the state agreed to accept the terms and conditions of the congressional mandate.”
State Ex Rel. Bryant v. Dolan, 249 N.W. 923 (S.D. 1933). “503 [7 USCA § 301 et seq.]), and subsequently amended to enlarge its scope.”
Rieder v. Rogan, 12 F. Supp. 307 (S.D. Cal. 1935). “In the same year, provision was made for improving instruction in agriculture throughout the country through the Morrill Lands Grant Act (7 USCA § 301 et seq.). In 1884 the Bureau of Animal Husbandry was established to disseminate information as to domestic animals and their…”
Pennsylvania State Univ. v. Derry Twp. Sch. Dist., 711 A.2d 615 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1998). “7 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. Under the Act, Congress provided land and other assistance for state universities that taught both agriculture and mechanical arts, provided that the state agreed to accept the terms and conditions of the congressional mandate.”
Empire Star Mines Co. v. Grass Valley Bullion Mines, 99 F.2d 228 (9th Cir. 1938). “S03, and amendments thereof, 7 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. 12 Paine’s scrip location was approved and, on December 30, 1882, a patent was issued to him for all of lot 7, including the Galena tract.”
West Virginia State Univ. Bd. of Governors v. The Dow Chem. Co. (S.D.W. Va 2020). “¶¶ 1-3, 7; see 7 U.S.C. §§ 301 et seq, 321 et seq. Defendants argue that WVU and WVSU are not analogous because they resulted from two different land-grant acts, some thirty years apart.”
California Agrarian Action Proj., Inc. v. Regents of the Univ. of California, 210 Cal. App. 3d 1245 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989). “Specifically, the Project relies on expressions of concern for the small farmer in the statutory terms and legislative history of the Morrill Act of 1862 ( 7 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.); the Smith-Lever Act of 1914 ( 7 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.