7 U.S.C. § 4501
Congressional findings and declaration of policy
2002—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–171 inserted “and on imported dairy products” after “commercial use” and struck out “produced in the United States” after “fluid milk and dairy products” in first sentence and inserted “or the right of any person to import dairy products” before period at end of second sentence.
For short title of title I of Pub. L. 98–180 as the “Dairy Production Stabilization Act of 1983”, see Short Title of 1983 Amendment note set out under section 1421 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2003–2004 · leading case: Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights v. Rumsfeld, 390 F.3d 219 (3rd Cir. 2004).
Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights v. Rumsfeld, 390 F.3d 219 (3rd Cir. 2004). “Unlike Cochran, there were no mandatory assessments similar to those imposed on milk producers under the Dairy Promotion Stabilization Act of 1983, 7 U.S.C. § 4501 et seq. The teachings of United 92 Foods and Cochran are not applicable because, unlike the compelled advertising…”
ANN VENEMAN, Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Agric.,Nat'l DAIRY PROMOTION Bd., 359 F.3d 263 (3rd Cir. 2004). “prescribed by the order shall be Act of 1983, 7 U.S.C. § 4501 et seq. 15 cents per hundredweight of (“Dairy Promotion Act,” “Dairy Act,” or milk for commercial use or the “Act”), provides for the creation of the equivalent thereof, as determined Dairy Promotion Program and…”
Cochran v. Veneman, 252 F. Supp. 2d 126 (M.D. Penn. 2003). “7 U.S.C. §§ 4501 (a)(l)-(4). In so doing, Congress declared that it is in the public interest to authorize the establishment, through the exercise of the powers provided herein, of an orderly procedure for financing (through assessments on all milk produced in the United States…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.