7 U.S.C. § 451
“Agricultural products” defined
When used in this chapter the term “agricultural products” means agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, and dairy products, livestock and the products thereof, the products of poultry and bee raising, the edible products of forestry, and any and all products raised or produced on farms and processed or manufactured products thereof, transported or intended to be transported in interstate and/or foreign commerce.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1927–2008 · leading case: Lopes v. Vieira, 543 F. Supp. 2d 1149 (E.D. Cal. 2008).
Lopes v. Vieira, 543 F. Supp. 2d 1149 (E.D. Cal. 2008). “§§ 291-292 ), and the Cooperative Marketing Act ( 7 U.S.C.A. § 451 , et seq.), CVD operates on behalf of and for the benefit of its member dairies, collecting proceeds from the sale of milk for the member dairies, and holding those proceeds in trust and for the benefit of the…”
Farmers Coop. Co. v. Birmingham, 86 F. Supp. 201 (N.D. Iowa 1949). “802 , 7 U.S.C.A. § 451 (establishing a cooperative division in the Department of *230 Agriculture); Section 3(a)(5) of the Securities Act of 1933, 48 Stat.”
United States v. Turner Turpentine Co., 111 F.2d 400 (5th Cir. 1940). “802 , 7 U.S.C.A. § 451 et seq.; 44 Stat. 1423 , Sec.”
Lopes v. Vieira, 488 F. Supp. 2d 1000 (E.D. Cal. 2007). “§§ 291-292 ), and the Cooperative Marketing Act ( 7 U.S.C.A. § 451 , et seq.).” ¶31. It is further alleged that “Defendant CVD, at all times material herein, marketed and brokered Plaintiffs’ product (milk), on Plaintiffs’ behalf, pursuant to CVD’s Bylaws, and statute” and that…”
In Re Chicken Antitrust Litig., 560 F. Supp. 963 (N.D. Ga. 1980). “§ 291 , and the Cooperative Marketing Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 451 . The defendants also filed counterclaims alleging that the plaintiffs and unnamed absent class members conspired to artificially depress prices of broilers below the market level to the defendants’ injury.”
Levine v. Conner, 540 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (N.D. Cal. 2008). “, 7 U.S.C. §§451 ; 608c(2); 1301(b)(5), (6)(A); 1942(a)(2); 2132(g); 2274; 3154(b)(2); 6982(a)(4); 7412(1)(B), (C); 7627(b)(3); 7702(10); 8320(a)(4)(A), (B)(i).”
Bowles v. Inland Empire Dairy Ass'n, 53 F. Supp. 210 (E.D. Wash. 1943). “It took over the Division of Co-operative Marketing established in the Bureau of Agricultural Economics under the Co-operative Marketing Act of 1926, 7 U.S.C.A. § 451 et seq., greatly enlarged the staff, and undertook to build up national distributive organizations for the…”
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. United States, 209 F. Supp. 35 (N.D. Ill. 1962). “‘perishable” include livestock in the definition ( 7 U.S.C.A. §§ 451 , 1626), whereas the statutes that use the modifier “perishable” with equivalent phrases do not include livestock.”
Boise Cascade Int'l, Inc. v. N. Minnesota Pulpwood Producers Ass'n, 294 F. Supp. 1015 (D. Minnesota 1968). “The Co-operative Marketing Act, 7 U.S.C. § 451 , defines “agricultural products” to include only “the edible products of forestry.”
Frost v. Corp. Comm'n of Oklahoma, 26 F.2d 508 (W.D. Okla. 1927). “1 (7 USCA § 451). If said proviso under its terms or on its face be valid, though the Durant Co-operative Gin Company, acting under article 19, chapter 34, Compiled Oklahoma Statutes 1921, referred to as’the act of 1919, the purpose of which, being set out in section 5637, as…”
Northland Cranberries, Inc. v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., 382 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D. Mass. 2004). “; and the Cooperative Marketing Act of 1926, 7 U.S.C. § 451 , et seq.” The plaintiffs allege that Ocean Spray is not entitled to claim immunity under the Capper-Volstead Act, because Ocean Spray’s members include cranberry growers outside of the United States.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.