7 U.S.C. § 91

Short title

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

For convenience of reference, this chapter may be designated and cited as “The Naval Stores Act.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1930–1940 · leading case: Gurera v. United States, 40 F.2d 338 (8th Cir. 1930).
Gurera v. United States, 40 F.2d 338 (8th Cir. 1930). “1446 [2,7 USCA §§ 91, 92]), commonly known as the Jone3 Act, or, at least, is an abuse of the discretion imposed in the court by said act.”
United States v. Turner Turpentine Co., 111 F.2d 400 (5th Cir. 1940). “91, 7 U.S.C.A. § 91 , requiring the secretary of agriculture to establish standards for turpentine and resin, and the 1931 amendment of the Agricultural Marketing Act, U.”
Ruler v. United States, 47 F.2d 1070 (8th Cir. 1931). “1446 [2-7 USCA §§ 91, 92]). This validity is challenged on the grounds that the act is “vague and uncertain” and fails to define “slight” or “casual” offense; that it delegates legislative power to the courts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.