7 U.S.C. § 913

CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a) [Repealed section 229a of this title.]“(b)

[Amended section 101(a) [title XI, § 1127] of Pub. L. 105–277, former 7 U.S.C. 1421 note.]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1953–1993 · leading case: Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 115 F. Supp. 402 (D.D.C. 1953).
Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 115 F. Supp. 402 (D.D.C. 1953). “” 7 U.S.C.A. § 913 . Defendants contend that the above acquisition is justified because it is merely incidental and contributory to the essential statutory purpose of Section 4 of the Act by making possible the service of electric power to a considerable number of unserved…”
Rochester v. Peoples Co-op. Power Ass'n, 505 N.W.2d 621 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “" 7 U.S.C.A. § 913 . [3] There was evidence that the City could serve the construction of the incinerator by using a generator; however, the City concedes that method would be less reliable and more expensive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.