8 U.S.C. § 1224

Designation of ports of entry for aliens arriving by aircraft

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 8 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Attorney General is authorized (1) by regulation to designate as ports of entry for aliens arriving by aircraft any of the ports of entry for civil aircraft designated as such in accordance with law; (2) by regulation to provide such reasonable requirements for aircraft in civil air navigation with respect to giving notice of intention to land in advance of landing, or notice of landing, as shall be deemed necessary for purposes of administration and enforcement of this chapter; and (3) by regulation to provide for the application to civil air navigation of the provisions of this chapter where not expressly so provided in this chapter to such extent and upon such conditions as he deems necessary. Any person who violates any regulation made under this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $2,000 which may be remitted or mitigated by the Attorney General in accordance with such proceedings as the Attorney General shall by regulation prescribe. In case the violation is by the owner or person in command of the aircraft, the penalty shall be a lien upon the aircraft, and such aircraft may be libeled therefore in the appropriate United States court. The determination by the Attorney General and remission or mitigation of the civil penalty shall be final. In case the violation is by the owner or person in command of the aircraft, the penalty shall be a lien upon the aircraft and may be collected by proceedings in rem which shall conform as nearly as may be to civil suits in admiralty. The Supreme Court of the United States, and under its direction other courts of the United States, are authorized to prescribe rules regulating such proceedings against aircraft in any particular not otherwise provided by law. Any aircraft made subject to a lien by this section may be summarily seized by, and placed in the custody of such persons as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe. The aircraft may be released from such custody upon deposit of such amount not exceeding $2,000 as the Attorney General may prescribe, or of a bond in such sum and with such sureties as the Attorney General may prescribe, conditioned upon the payment of the penalty which may be finally determined by the Attorney General.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 14 cases, 1954–2011 · leading case: In the Matter of Petition for Naturalization of Richard John Longstaff, 716 F.2d 1439 (5th Cir. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In the Matter of Petition for Naturalization of Richard John Longstaff, 716 F.2d 1439 (5th Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “8 U.S.C. § 1224 (Supp. V 1981). This certificate constituted the evidentiary basis for exclusion at the exclusion hearing.”

Lesbian/Gay Freedom Day Comm., Inc. v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 541 F. Supp. 569 (N.D. Cal. 1982). · cites it 5× “8 U.S.C. § 1224 . This certificate constitutes the evidentiary basis for exclusion at the exclusion hearing.”

United States v. Francisco Rincon-Jimenez, 595 F.2d 1192 (9th Cir. 1979). “See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1224 ,1225. In April 1978, almost nine years following his illegal entry, appellant was charged with violating 8 U.”

Anacelia Perez-Roblero v. Eric Holder, Jr., 431 F. App'x 461 (6th Cir. 2011). “§ 1227 (a)(2)(A)(iii) or for reasons related to national security under 8 U.S.C. § 1224 (a)(4); and (4) she has established by clear and convincing evidence that she “has the means to depart the United States and intends to do so.”

George B. Petite v. United States, 262 F.2d 788 (4th Cir. 1959). ““Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury * * * Now 8 U.S.C.A. § 1224 . ** Now 8 U.S.C.A. § 1220 .”

Lazaro Alonso-Martinez v. Doris Meissner, Acting Comm'r, U.S. Dep't of Just., Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 697 F.2d 1160 (D.C. Cir. 1983). · cites it 3× “See 8 U.S.C. § 1224 . Certifications fall into three categories: Class A (mental or physical conditions constituting mandatory grounds for exclusion, see 8 U.”

Lopez v. Aran, 649 F. Supp. 853 (D.P.R. 1986). “[and] shall be conducted in accordance with section 234, 235, 236 and 237 of the [A]ct [ 8 U.S.C. §§ 1224 , 1225, 1226 and 1227] .”

Clive Michael Boutilier v. The Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 363 F.2d 488 (2d Cir. 1966). “” 8 In support of this position, Boutilier relies on section 234 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1224 , which directs that certification of the physical and mental condition of “arriving aliens * * * shall be made by medical officers of the United States Public Health Service, who shall…”

Hill v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 714 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1983). · cites it 8× “2 8 U.S.C. § 1224 (1976 & Supp. V 1981). This certificate constitutes the evidentiary basis for exclusion.”

In Re for Naturalization of Hollinger, 211 F. Supp. 203 (E.D. Mich. 1962). “” The only evidence upon which a finding of insanity can be made for the purpose of an exclusion proceeding is a certification under 8 U.S.C. § 1224 by a medical officer of the United States Public Health Service, or specially designated civil surgeons, or a board of Public…”

Reaume v. United States, 124 F. Supp. 851 (E.D. Mich. 1954). “Now 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1224 , 1225(a), 1226, 1357(b), 1362.”

Hill v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 775 F.2d 1037 (9th Cir. 1985). “In August 1979, the Surgeon General announced that the PHS would no longer certify homosexuality per se as a mental disease or defect, and that homosexuality was not determinable through a medical diagnostic procedure.”

Show all 14 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.