U.S. Code
»
Title 8
» Chapter CHAPTER 12— IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— IMMIGRATION › Part Part IV— Inspection, Apprehension, Examination, Exclusion, and Removal
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
16
cases (
9 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case:
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).
· cites it 2× “§ 1160 (b)(7) (penalizing knowing and willful false statement of material fact in application for status of special agricultural worker); 8 U. S. C. § 1225a(c)(6) (penalizing knowing and willful false statement of material fact in application for special status by virtue of…”
Samirah v. Holder, 627 F.3d 652 (7th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 2× “immigration checkpoints at foreign airports in order to prevent unauthorized persons from flying into the United States, 8 U.S.C. § 1225a; 8 C.F.R. § 235.5 ; A. James Vazquez-Azpiri & Daniel C.”
United States v. Michael E. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 1994).
“§ 1160 (b)(7) (penalizing knowing and willful false statement of material fact in application for status of special agricultural worker); 8 U.S.C. § 1225a(c)(6) (penalizing knowing and willful false statement of material fact in application for special status by virtue of…”
Rodolfo Pedroza-Padilla v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 1362 (9th Cir. 2007).
“The Director reasoned that Pedroza could not demonstrate continuous residence within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1225a(g)(2)(B)(i) because he had left the United States in 1985 under an order of deportation.”
Giron Reyes v. Lyons, 801 F. Supp. 3d 797 (N.D. Iowa 2025).
“In addition, its sister statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1225a, focuses on the pre-inspection of aliens entering the country at foreign airports.”
Jose Alejandro v. Forestal, No. 1:25-cv-02027 (S.D. Ind. Oct. 11, 2025).
“In addition, its sister statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1225a, focuses on the pre-inspection of aliens entering the country at foreign airports.”
Sheehan, No. 5:25-cv-04052 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 30, 2025).
“In addition, its sister statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1225a, focuses on the pre-inspection of aliens entering the country at foreign airports.”
Sheehan, No. 5:25-cv-04053 (N.D. Iowa Nov. 12, 2025).
“Its sister statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1225a, focuses on the pre-inspection of aliens entering the country at foreign airports.”
Bondi, No. 5:25-cv-04063 (N.D. Iowa Dec. 9, 2025).
“Its sister statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1225a, focuses on the pre-inspection of aliens entering the country at foreign airports.”
Hott, No. 1:25-cv-02137 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 30, 2025).
“In addition, its sister statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1225a, focuses on the pre-inspection of aliens entering the country at foreign airports.”
Crowley, No. 2:25-cv-00560 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 30, 2025).
“In addition, its sister statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1225a, focuses on the pre-inspection of aliens entering the country at foreign airports.”
Olson, No. 2:25-cv-00622 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 30, 2025).
“In addition, its sister statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1225a, focuses on the pre-inspection of aliens entering the country at foreign airports.”
8 U.S.C. § 1225a(c)(6): 2 cases
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).
“§ 1160 (b)(7) (penalizing knowing and willful false statement of material fact in application for status of special agricultural worker); 8 U. S. C. § 1225a(c)(6) (penalizing knowing and willful false statement of material fact in application for special status by virtue of…”
United States v. Michael E. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 1994).
“§ 1160 (b)(7) (penalizing knowing and willful false statement of material fact in application for status of special agricultural worker); 8 U.S.C. § 1225a(c)(6) (penalizing knowing and willful false statement of material fact in application for special status by virtue of…”
8 U.S.C. § 1225a(g)(2)(B)(i): 2 cases
Rodolfo Pedroza-Padilla v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 1362 (9th Cir. 2007).
“The Director reasoned that Pedroza could not demonstrate continuous residence within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1225a(g)(2)(B)(i) because he had left the United States in 1985 under an order of deportation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.