8 U.S.C. § 1257
Adjustment of status of certain resident aliens to nonimmigrant status; exceptions
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–208 substituted “time of admission” for “time of entry”.
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–208 effective, with certain transitional provisions, on the first day of the first month beginning more than 180 days after
For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1967–2020 · leading case: Catherine Torres v. William Barr, 976 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2020).
Catherine Torres v. William Barr, 976 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2020). “For example, in 8 U.S.C. § 1257 (a), Congress permitted the Attorney General to adjust the status of an immigrant who met certain conditions “at the time of admission or subsequently.”
United States v. Sabri Yakou, 428 F.3d 241 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “l opinion from the Acting General Counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) stating that a LPR “remains a lawful permanent resident until the Government proves otherwise in deportation or exclusion proceedings against him or her, or until the petitioner…”
Saxbe v. Bustos, 419 U.S. 65 (1974). “But we read the Act as did the Ninth Circuit in the Gooch case to mean that the change in status which Congress had in mind was a change from an immigrant lawfully admitted for permanent residence to the status of a nonimmigrant pursuant to 8 U. S. C. § 1257 . 433 F. 2d, at 79 .…”
Doe v. St. Louis Cmty. Coll., 526 S.W.3d 329 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017). “However, the court identified numerous portions of the statutes, cases, and administrative agency decisions, applying the statutes, which use some form of the term "resident alien” as shorthand to refer to "lawful permanent resident.”
Edward Ying, & Felilu Ying v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Cross-Appellee, 25 F.3d 84 (2d Cir. 1994). “See INA § 247(a), 8 U.S.C. § 1257 (a); see also Nauck v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv.”
Fredy Paul Albillo-Figueroa v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 221 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2000). “8 U.S.C. § 1257 was formerly codified at 8 U.”
Foley v. Connelie, 419 F. Supp. 889 (S.D.N.Y. 1976). “Aliens are eligible for the United States draft only if they have immigrant status, 32 C.F.R. § 1611.”
Julio Garcia Rivera v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 791 F.2d 1202 (5th Cir. 1986). “In Matter ofS- the Board then turned to the key phrase “such status not having *1206 changed” and stated that this language referred to aliens who have changed their status from immigrants to nonimmigrants pursuant section 247, 8 U.S.C. § 1257 . “[I]t is logical to assume that…”
United States v. Yakou, Sabri, 393 F.3d 231 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “l opinion from the Acting General Counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) stating that a LPR “remains a lawful permanent resident until the Government proves otherwise in deportation or exclusion proceedings against him or her, or until the petitioner…”
Wing Wa Lee v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 375 F.2d 723 (9th Cir. 1967). “( 8 U.S.C. § 1257 ), and 249 ( 8 U.S.C. § 1259 ).”
Cheng Ho Mui & Pun Yi Pan v. Dominick Rinaldi, as Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. of New Jersey, 408 F.2d 28 (3rd Cir. 1969). “§ 1254 (a)); (2) they are alien crewmen whose status cannot be adjusted under Section 245 ( 8 U.”
United States v. Roman Stanislaw Ryba, 441 F.2d 1137 (3rd Cir. 1971). “8 U.S.C. § 1257 . But the registrant’s situation is not covered by that statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.