8 U.S.C. § 800
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1944–2006 · leading case: Kawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952).
Kawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952). “§ 1999, 8 U. S. C. § 800 , which survived the Nationality Act of 1940 and is not part of it, and which proclaims the right of expatriation as "a natural and inherent right of all people.”
Dos Reis Ex Rel. Camara v. Nicolls, 161 F.2d 860 (1st Cir. 1947). “223 , 8 U.S. C.A. § 800, Congress declared that the "right of expatriation is a natural and inherent right of all people, indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness".”
Mandoli v. Acheson, 344 U.S. 133 (1952). “223 , 8 U. S. C. § 800 . [6] H. R. Doc. No. 326, 59th Cong.”
Bauer v. Clark, 161 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1947). “§ 1999, 8 U.S.C.A. § 800 , which defines the right of expatriation.”
United States v. Tomoya Kawakita, 96 F. Supp. 824 (S.D. Cal. 1951). “’ [ 8 U.S.C.A. § 800 ].- Expatriation is the voluntary renunciation of one’s citizenship — a voluntary act done with intent to renounce or forswear allegiance to the country of one’s birth.”
Savorgnan v. United States, 338 U.S. 491 (1950). “it is necessary to the maintenance of public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed: Therefore, “Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any declaration,…”
Tomoya Kawakita v. United States, 190 F.2d 506 (9th Cir. 1951). “§ 800 : “Right of expatriation “Whereas the right of expatriation is a natural and inherent right of all people, • indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and whereas in the recognition of this principle this Government has…”
Walter Briehl v. John Foster Dulles, Sec'y of State, 248 F.2d 561 (D.C. Cir. 1957). “§ 1999, 8 U.S.C. § 800 (1940). 21 Although designed to apply especially to the rights of immigrants to shed their foreign nationalities, that Act of Congress “is also broad enough to cover, and does cover, the corresponding natural and inherent right of American citizens to…”
Lapides v. Clark, 176 F.2d 619 (D.C. Cir. 1949). “He contends that Section 804 is unconstitutional; therefore, that his American citizenship remains unaffected by his prolonged residence abroad.”
People v. Jones, 140 P.3d 325 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). “8 U.S.C. § 800 . In 1940, Congress enacted the Nationality Act, 54 Stat.”
Lee You Fee, by Lee Q. Pon, His Next Friend v. John Foster Dulles, as Sec'y of State, 236 F.2d 885 (7th Cir. 1956). “” Sections 400 to 410 of the 1940 Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 800 *888 to 810, 2 deal only with expatriation.”
United States v. Tomoya Kawakita, 108 F. Supp. 627 (S.D. Cal. 1952). “8 U.S.C.A. § 800 . The evidence leaves no doubt but that the defendant knew these things.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.