U.S. Code » Title 9 » Chapter CHAPTER 2— CONVENTION ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS

9 U.S.C. § 207

Award of arbitrators; confirmation; jurisdiction; proceeding

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 9 CasesGoogle Scholar

Within three years after an arbitral award falling under the Convention is made, any party to the arbitration may apply to any court having jurisdiction under this chapter for an order confirming the award as against any other party to the arbitration. The court shall confirm the award unless it finds one of the grounds for refusal or deferral of recognition or enforcement of the award specified in the said Convention.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 481 cases (167 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: Belize Soc. Dev. Ltd. v. Gov't of Belize, 668 F.3d 724 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Belize Soc. Dev. Ltd. v. Gov't of Belize, 668 F.3d 724 (D.C. Cir. 2012). · cites it 10× “ROGERS, Circuit Judge: This case involves a petition to confirm and enforce a foreign arbitration award against the Government of Belize pursuant to section 207 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 207 . The plaintiff appeals an order staying the proceeding pending the…”
Lindo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd., 652 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2011). · cites it 10× “§ 206 , and (2) at a later stage, an action to confirm an arbitral award made pursuant to an arbitration agreement, 9 U.S.C. § 207 . See Czarina, L.L.C. v. W.”
CBF Indústria de Gusa S/A v. AMCI Holdings, Inc., 850 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 2017). · cites it 4× “” 9 U.S.C. § 207 . Additionally, Chapter 2 of the FAA provides that “[t]he court shall confirm the award unless it finds one of the grounds for refusal or deferral of recognition or enforcement of the award specified in the [New York] Convention” at Article V.”
Compania De Inversiones v. Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua, 970 F.3d 1269 (10th Cir. 2020). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff - Appellant CIMSA brought a district court action in 2015 pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 207 , to confirm a foreign arbitral award issued in Bolivia against Defendant - Appellee GCC.”
Commissions Imp. Exp. S.A. v. Repub. of the Congo, 757 F.3d 321 (D.C. Cir. 2014). · cites it 8× “The district court denied the Company’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint on the ground that the three-year period to confirm a foreign arbitral award under Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 207 , preempted the longer period to…”
Seetransport Wiking Trader Schiffarhtsgesellschaft Mbh & Co., Kommanditgesellschaft v. Navimpex Centrala Navala & Uzinexportimport, 989 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1993). · cites it 4× “Thus, since 9 U.S.C. § 207 permits an action seeking to confirm an arbitral award to be brought within “ ‘three years after an arbi-tral award falling under the Convention is made .”
Zurich Am. Insurnce v. Team Tankers A.S., 811 F.3d 584 (2d Cir. 2016). · cites it 2× “” 9 U.S.C. § 207 . 2 Within three years after an arbitral award falling under the Convention is made, any party to the arbitration may apply to any court having jurisdiction under this chapter for an order confirming the award as against any other party to the arbitration.”
China Minmetals Materials Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. v. Chi Mei Corp., 334 F.3d 274 (3d Cir. 2003). · cites it 3× “9 U.S.C. § 207 provides: Within three years after an arbitral award falling under the Convention is made, any party to the arbitration may apply to any court having jurisdiction under this chapter for an order confirming the award as against any other party to the arbitration.”
Encyclopaedia Universalis S.A. v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., Docket No. 04-0288-Cv, 403 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2005). · cites it 3× “” 9 U.S.C. § 207 . Article V of the Convention specifies seven exclusive grounds upon which courts may refuse to recognize an award.”
Ministry of Def. & Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Repub. of Iran v. Cubic Def. Sys., Inc., 665 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3× “See 9 U.S.C. § 207 . 1 The district court issued *1095 an order granting the Ministry’s petition in December 1998.”
Int'l Trading & Indus. Inv. Co. v. Dyncorp Aerospace Tech., 763 F. Supp. 2d 12 (D.D.C. 2011). · cites it 4× “e Court is an amended petition filed by petitioner International Trading and Industrial Investment Company, formerly known as International Trading and Investment Company (“International Trading”), to confirm an arbitral award (the “Award”) rendered in its favor and against…”
Esso Expl. & Prod. Nigeria Ltd. v. Nigerian Nat'l Petroleum Corp., 40 F.4th 56 (2d Cir. 2022). · cites it 3× “See 9 U.S.C. § 207 . The New York Convention generally obligates signatory states to enforce an award made by an arbitral panel in another signatory state, referred to as the “primary jurisdiction.”
Show all 481 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.