9 U.S.C. § 207
Award of arbitrators; confirmation; jurisdiction; proceeding
Within three years after an arbitral award falling under the Convention is made, any party to the arbitration may apply to any court having jurisdiction under this chapter for an order confirming the award as against any other party to the arbitration. The court shall confirm the award unless it finds one of the grounds for refusal or deferral of recognition or enforcement of the award specified in the said Convention.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 481
cases (167 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: Belize Soc. Dev. Ltd. v. Gov't of Belize, 668 F.3d 724 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
Belize Soc. Dev. Ltd. v. Gov't of Belize, 668 F.3d 724 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “ROGERS, Circuit Judge: This case involves a petition to confirm and enforce a foreign arbitration award against the Government of Belize pursuant to section 207 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 207 . The plaintiff appeals an order staying the proceeding pending the…”
Lindo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd., 652 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2011). “§ 206 , and (2) at a later stage, an action to confirm an arbitral award made pursuant to an arbitration agreement, 9 U.S.C. § 207 . See Czarina, L.L.C. v. W.”
CBF Indústria de Gusa S/A v. AMCI Holdings, Inc., 850 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 2017). “” 9 U.S.C. § 207 . Additionally, Chapter 2 of the FAA provides that “[t]he court shall confirm the award unless it finds one of the grounds for refusal or deferral of recognition or enforcement of the award specified in the [New York] Convention” at Article V.”
Compania De Inversiones v. Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua, 970 F.3d 1269 (10th Cir. 2020). “Plaintiff - Appellant CIMSA brought a district court action in 2015 pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 207 , to confirm a foreign arbitral award issued in Bolivia against Defendant - Appellee GCC.”
Commissions Imp. Exp. S.A. v. Repub. of the Congo, 757 F.3d 321 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “The district court denied the Company’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint on the ground that the three-year period to confirm a foreign arbitral award under Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 207 , preempted the longer period to…”
Seetransport Wiking Trader Schiffarhtsgesellschaft Mbh & Co., Kommanditgesellschaft v. Navimpex Centrala Navala & Uzinexportimport, 989 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1993). “Thus, since 9 U.S.C. § 207 permits an action seeking to confirm an arbitral award to be brought within “ ‘three years after an arbi-tral award falling under the Convention is made .”
Zurich Am. Insurnce v. Team Tankers A.S., 811 F.3d 584 (2d Cir. 2016). “” 9 U.S.C. § 207 . 2 Within three years after an arbitral award falling under the Convention is made, any party to the arbitration may apply to any court having jurisdiction under this chapter for an order confirming the award as against any other party to the arbitration.”
China Minmetals Materials Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. v. Chi Mei Corp., 334 F.3d 274 (3rd Cir. 2003). “9 U.S.C. § 207 provides: Within three years after an arbitral award falling under the Convention is made, any party to the arbitration may apply to any court having jurisdiction under this chapter for an order confirming the award as against any other party to the arbitration.”
Encyclopaedia Universalis S.A. v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., Docket No. 04-0288-Cv, 403 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2005). “” 9 U.S.C. § 207 . Article V of the Convention specifies seven exclusive grounds upon which courts may refuse to recognize an award.”
Ministry of Def. & Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Repub. of Iran v. Cubic Def. Sys., Inc., 665 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2011). “See 9 U.S.C. § 207 . 1 The district court issued *1095 an order granting the Ministry’s petition in December 1998.”
Int'l Trading & Indus. Inv. Co. v. Dyncorp Aerospace Tech., 763 F. Supp. 2d 12 (D.D.C. 2011). “e Court is an amended petition filed by petitioner International Trading and Industrial Investment Company, formerly known as International Trading and Investment Company (“International Trading”), to confirm an arbitral award (the “Award”) rendered in its favor and against…”
Esso Expl. & Prod. Nigeria Ltd. v. Nigerian Nat'l Petroleum Corp., 40 F.4th 56 (2d Cir. 2022). “See 9 U.S.C. § 207 . The New York Convention generally obligates signatory states to enforce an award made by an arbitral panel in another signatory state, referred to as the “primary jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.