9 U.S.C. § 6
Application heard as motion
Any application to the court hereunder shall be made and heard in the manner provided by law for the making and hearing of motions, except as otherwise herein expressly provided.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 176
cases (74 in the last 5 years), 1927–2026 · leading case: ISC Holding AG v. Nobel Biocare Fin. AG, 688 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2012).
ISC Holding AG v. Nobel Biocare Fin. AG, 688 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2012). “But 9 U.S.C. § 6 does instruct more generally that “[a]ny application to the court hereunder [including petitions to compel under § 4] shall be made and heard in the manner provided by law for the making and hearing of motions.”
Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Gussi, S.A. De C.V., 92 F.4th 815 (9th Cir. 2024). “” 9 U.S.C. § 6 . In federal district court, Rule 5 generally governs the service of “written motion[s]” and “notice[s] .”
Moses H. Cone Mem'l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1 (1983). “The Hospital responded with full briefing and extensive evidentiary submissions on the arbitrability issue, and it requested oral argument and a jury trial.”
CPR Mgmt. SA v. Devon Park Bioventures LP, 19 F.4th 236 (3rd Cir. 2021). “One such procedure is set forth in 9 U.S.C. § 6 , which states that “[a]ny application to the court [under the FAA] shall be made and heard in the manner provided by law for the making and hearing of motions, except as otherwise herein expressly provided.”
Cullinane v. Beverly Enters.-Neb., Inc., 300 Neb. 210 (Neb. 2018). “71 9 U.S.C. § 6 . 72 Tepper Realty Company v.”
Rosenthal v. Great W. Fin. Sec. Corp., 926 P.2d 1061 (Cal. 1996). “” ( 9 U.S.C. § 6 .) Section 7 provides for court enforcement of arbitrators’ summonses of witnesses.”
PG Publ'g Co v. Newspaper Guild of Pittsburgh, 19 F.4th 308 (3rd Cir. 2021). “9 U.S.C. § 6 . Neither FAA Section 9, which provides for confirmation of arbitration awards, nor FAA Section 10, which provides for vacatur of arbitration awards, prescribe other procedures.”
Timothy Boykin v. Fam. Dollar Stores of Mich., 3 F.4th 832 (6th Cir. 2021). “9 U.S.C. § 6 . So Family Dollar’s motion is best read as one partially under § 4 because it sought to compel Boykin to arbitrate (although it also sought to dismiss Boykin’s complaint and did not cite § 4).”
O.R. Sec., Inc. v. Prof'l Plan. Assocs., Inc., 857 F.2d 742 (11th Cir. 1988). “” 9 U.S.C. § 6 . Rule 81(a)(3), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provides that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply to proceedings brought under the Arbitration Act “only to the extent that matters of procedure are not provided for in those statutes.”
Technologists, Inc. v. Mir's Ltd., 725 F. Supp. 2d 120 (D.D.C. 2010). “” 9 U.S.C. § 6 . III. DISCUSSION Mir’s seeks relief from this Court’s final order vacating the Arbitral Award pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4).”
Teamsters Local 177 v. United Parcel Serv., 966 F.3d 245 (3rd Cir. 2020). “9 U.S.C. § 6 (“Any application to the court hereunder shall be made and heard in the manner provided by law for the making and hearing of motions, except as otherwise .”
Stenzel v. Dell, Inc., 2005 ME 37 (Me. 2005). “§ 5928(1) (2003); see also 9 U.S.C.A. § 6 (1999) (“Any application to the court hereunder shall be made and heard in the manner provided by law for the making and hearing of motions .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.