Determining when errors are real and substantial (Utah) · Go Syfert
Utah issues › Jury Selection and Trial Misconduct › Harmless and Plain Error Analysis

Determining when errors are real and substantialthin

Also stated as: Determining substantial and injurious effect of error

3 Utah opinions cite these pages1982–20252 pages cited by Utah courts

The pages courts cite for it

Ranked by how often Utah courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.

Utah opinions citing these pages

From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.

Named doctrine

nature of the alleged error · 10 opinions

The doctrine as Utah courts name it, with the cases on each side (State Issue Map).

Filed under: Harmless and Plain Error Analysis

All issues in this group →

Where else it is alive

Federal 468TX 180DC 47MI 45IN 34KY 27FL 18NV 14MA 10MO 8NY 8GA 7VA 7SC 6PA 5MD 4AR 3CA 3IL 3AK 2AZ 2ID 2MN 2OK 2SD 2WA 2CO 1GU 1NC 1ND 1NM 1OH 1VI 1

Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.

How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law