Utah Code
Utah Code § 13-11-22 (2026)
Exemptions from application of act
✓ laws through the 2026 General Session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This act does not apply to:
an act or practice required or specifically permitted by or under state or federal law;
a publisher, broadcaster, printer, or other person engaged in the dissemination of information or the reproduction of printed or pictorial matter so far as the information or matter has been disseminated or reproduced on behalf of others without actual knowledge that it violated this act;
claim for personal injury or death or claim for damage to property other than the property that is the subject of the consumer transaction;
credit terms of a transaction otherwise subject to this act; or
any public utility subject to the regulating jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission of the state of Utah.
A person alleged to have violated this act has the burden of showing the applicability of this section.
Amended by Chapter 442, 2025 General Session
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2024 · leading case: Wade v. Jobe, 818 P.2d 1006 (Utah 1991).
Wade v. Jobe, 818 P.2d 1006 (Utah 1991). “In addition to excepting securities and insurance in the definition of consumer transaction, section 13-11-22 specifically excepts a number of other acts, practices, persons, and claims from the application of the UCSPA.”
Naranjo v. Cherrington Firm, LLC, 285 F. Supp. 3d 1242 (D. Utah 2018). “In the case at hand, this was neither the intent of the Utah legislature, see § 13-11-22 (exemptions), nor Congress, see 15 U.”
Young v. Erickson, No. 2:23-cv-00420 (D. Utah Jan. 8, 2024). “36 Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-22 (1)(a). 37 Docket No.”
Johns v. CR Bard, No. 2:18-cv-01509 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 1, 2020). “Consumer Sales Practices Act Although Plaintiff had alleged a claim for violation of Utah’s Consumer Sales Practices Act, Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-22 , Plaintiff’s Liaison Counsel informed the Court during oral argument that Plaintiff was withdrawing that claim and presented no…”
Utah Code § 13-11-22(1)(a): 1 case
Naranjo v. Cherrington Firm, LLC, 285 F. Supp. 3d 1242 (D. Utah 2018). “In the case at hand, this was neither the intent of the Utah legislature, see § 13-11-22 (exemptions), nor Congress, see 15 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.