Utah Code
Utah Code § 13-24-1 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter is known as the "Uniform Trade Secrets Act."
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: Yanaki v. Iomed, Inc., 415 F.3d 1204 (10th Cir. 2005).
Yanaki v. Iomed, Inc., 415 F.3d 1204 (10th Cir. 2005). “In its memorandum in support of the ex parte motion, Iomed supplied three legal bases for issuance of the order: (1) the Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act, codified as Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-24-1 to -9, which Iomed asserted provides Utah courts with authority to protect trade secrets…”
Coop. Commc'ns, Inc. v. AT & T CORP., 867 F. Supp. 1511 (D. Utah 1994). “They are: (1) intentional interference with prospective economic relations; (2) interference with contract; (3) business disparagement; (4) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (5) unfair competition; (6) violation of the Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Utah…”
Envirotech Corp. v. Callahan, 872 P.2d 487 (Utah Ct. App. 1994). “See Utah Code Ann. § 13-24-1 to -9 (1992). However, because this section was adopted after the events giving rise to this action had occurred it does not govern the disposition of this case.”
Evans v. Gen. Motors Corp., 893 A.2d 371 (Conn. 2006). “(2001); Utah Code Ann. § 13-24-1 et seq. (2005); Va.”
ClearOne Commc'ns, Inc. v. Chiang, 608 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (D. Utah 2009). “) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-24-1 to 13-24-9 (2005) (UUTSA), provides authority to the court to order injunctive relief when a trade secret has been misappropriated.”
Coop. Commc'ns, Inc. v. at & T, 31 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (D. Utah 1999). “They are: (1) intentional interference with prospective economic relations; (2) interference with contract; (3) business disparagement; (4) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (5) unfair competition; (6) violation of the Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Utah…”
Dur-A-Flex, Inc. v. Dy, 349 Conn. 513 (Conn. 2024). “Utah December 13, 2007) (‘‘Although [Utah’s Uniform Trade Secret Act, Utah Code Ann. § 13-24-1 et seq.] uses the phrase ‘knowledge of the trade secret,’ there is no authority that this phrase creates an element of comprehension.”
United States of Am. v. St. Mark's Hosp. (D. Utah 2019). “7 Counterclaimant must provide “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,”8 which requires “more than an unadorned, the- [Counterclaim-Defendant]-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”
IBC Advanced Tech. v. 6th Wave Innovations (D. Utah 2020). “Schrider and 6th Wave have misappropriated or are threatening to misappropriate IBC’s trade secrets in violation of Utah’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”), Utah Code § 13-24-1 et seq. To establish a prima facie case of misappropriation under this statute, a party must…”
DIRTT Env't Solutions v. Henderson (D. Utah 2021). “Plaintiffs filed suit in December 2019 bringing a host of claims including, inter alia, violation of the Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Utah Code § 13-24-1, et seq); violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act ( 18 U.”
Sharetown v. Hall (D. Utah 2022). “Hall’s alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in violation of the Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UUTSA), Utah Code Ann. § 13-24-1 et seq. As the name suggests, a misappropriation of trade secrets claim requires “a protectable ‘trade secret’ of a plaintiff and .”
Quest Solution v. Redlpr LLC (D. Utah 2022). “2 The Act is codified at Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-24-1 et seq. 3 When the court cites a page in the record, it refers to the ECF pagination at the top of the page and not the pagination at the bottom of the page.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.