Utah Code » Title 58, Chapter 60 — Mental Health Professional Practice Act; part 58-60-1 — General Provisions
Utah Code

Utah Code § 58-60-113 (2026)

Evidentiary privilege

✓ laws through the 2026 General Session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Evidentiary privilege for mental health therapists regarding admissibility of any confidential communication in administrative, civil, or criminal proceedings is in accordance with Rule 506 of the Utah Rules of Evidence.

Enacted by Chapter 32, 1994 General Session

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1999–2002 · leading case: State v. Gomez, 2002 UT 120, 63 P.3d 72.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Gomez, 2002 UT 120, 63 P.3d 72. · cites it 2× “506(b); see also Utah Code Ann. § 58-60-113 (1998) (“Evidentiary privilege for mental health therapists regarding admissibility of any confidential communication in administrative, civil, or criminal proceedings is in accordance with Rule 506 of the Utah Rules of Evidence.”
State v. Cardall, 1999 UT 51, 982 P.2d 79. · cites it 2× “506(b); see also Utah Code Ann. § 58-60-113 , 2 -114. In addition, the State argues that even under Rit-chie, Cardall has no right to an in camera review because he has failed to establish some basis for concluding that S.”
Debry v. Goates, 2000 UT App 58, 999 P.2d 582. · cites it 2× “’ 506; see also Utah Code Ann. § 58-60-113 (1998) (stating evidentiary privilege for mental health therapists is in accordance with Utah Rule of Evidence 506).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.