Utah Code » Title 78B, Chapter 11 — Utah Uniform Arbitration Act
Utah Code

Utah Code § 78B-11-120 (2026)

Award

✓ laws through the 2026 General Session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
An arbitrator shall make a record of an award. The record must be signed or otherwise authenticated by any arbitrator who concurs with the award. The arbitrator or the arbitration organization shall give notice of the award, including a copy of the award, to each party to the arbitration proceeding.
An award must be made within the time specified by the agreement to arbitrate or, if not specified in the agreement, within the time ordered by the court. The court may extend or the parties to the arbitration proceeding may agree on the record to extend the time. The court or the parties may do so within or after the time specified or ordered. A party waives any objection that an award was not timely made unless the party gives notice of the objection to the arbitrator before receiving notice of the award.

Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 3, 2008 General Session

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: Denison Mines (USA) Corp. v. KGL Assocs., 2016 UT App 171, 381 P.3d 1167.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Denison Mines (USA) Corp. v. KGL Assocs., 2016 UT App 171, 381 P.3d 1167. · cites it 18× “The Timeliness of the Interim Award ¶15 KGL first contends that the arbitrator exceeded his authority under section 78B-11-120 of the Utah Code, which provides that “[a]n award must be made within the time specified by the agreement to arbitrate.”
Utah Code § 78B-11-120(2): 1 case
Denison Mines (USA) Corp. v. KGL Assocs., 2016 UT App 171, 381 P.3d 1167. “The Timeliness of the Interim Award ¶15 KGL first contends that the arbitrator exceeded his authority under section 78B-11-120 of the Utah Code, which provides that “[a]n award must be made within the time specified by the agreement to arbitrate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.