10/1/2026
Notwithstanding Section
16-1a-503
, any person or personal representative of the person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, who, in person or through an agent, does any of the following enumerated acts is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state as to any claim arising out of or related to:
the transaction of any business within this state;
contracting to supply services or goods in this state;
the causing of any injury within this state whether tortious or by breach of warranty;
the ownership, use, or possession of any real estate situated in this state;
contracting to insure any person, property, or risk located within this state at the time of contracting;
with respect to actions of divorce, separate maintenance, or child support, having resided, in the marital relationship, within this state notwithstanding subsequent departure from the state; or the commission in this state of the act giving rise to the claim, so long as that act is not a mere omission, failure to act, or occurrence over which the defendant had no control; or
the commission of sexual intercourse within this state which gives rise to a parentage action under Title 81, Chapter 5, Uniform Parentage Act, to determine parentage for the purpose of establishing responsibility for child support.
Amended by Chapter 92, 2026 General Session
Notes of Decisions
Iota v. Davco Mgmt. Co., 2016 UT App 231, 391 P.3d 239.
· cites it 2× “Utah Code Ann. § 78B-3-205 (LexisNexis 2012) (listing “the ownership, use, or possession of any real estate situated in this state” as sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction).”
Gardner v. SPX Corp., 2012 UT App 45, 272 P.3d 175.
· cites it 4× “Utah Code Ann. § 78B-3-205 (2008). 2 Here, the trial court ruled that "the facts in this case indicate that Schneider Canada's actions may fulfill one or some" of the requirements of the long-arm statute.”
Arnold v. Grigsby, 2009 UT 88, 225 P.3d 192.
· cites it 2× “[3] Renumbered in 2008 as sections 78B-3-205 to -206. [4] Dr. Grigsby moved from Utah in July 2000 to practice medicine in Tennessee.”
Go Invest Wisely LLC v. Murphy, 2016 UT App 185, 382 P.3d 631.
· cites it 2× “Sin[c]e he wants instead to rely on the complaint and seemingly convert his motion to a motion to dismiss on this point, the' Court notes the complaint contains facts indicating Muiphy whs transacting real estate sales with [GIW] which was located in Utah and Murphy received…”
Gillett v. Brown, 2017 UT App 19, 391 P.3d 1055.
· cites it 6× “Section 78-12-35 was renumbered to 78B-2-104 in February 2008 and amended in March 2009 to read: If a cause of action accrues against a person while the person is out of the state and the person is not subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state in accordance with…”
Dougan v. Minton, 868 F. Supp. 2d 1211 (D. Utah 2012).
· cites it 2× “The statute in its entirety provides: Notwithstanding Section 16-10a-1501, any person or personal representative of the person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, who, in person or through an agent, does any of the following enumerated acts is subject to the…”
Utah Code § 78B-3-205(1): 1 case
Utah Code § 78B-3-205(3): 3 cases
Utah Code § 78B-3-205(4): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.