Utah Code » Title 78B, Chapter 9 — Postconviction Remedies Act; part 78B-9-1 — General Provisions
Utah Code

Utah Code § 78B-9-103 (2026)

Applicability -- Effect on petitions

✓ laws through the 2026 General Session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except for the limitation period established in Section

78B-9-107

, this chapter applies only to post-conviction proceedings filed on or after July 1, 1996.

Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 3, 2008 General Session

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2013–2020 · leading case: Gressman v. State, 2013 UT 63, 323 P.3d 998.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gressman v. State, 2013 UT 63, 323 P.3d 998. · cites it 2× “§ 78B-9-103. And for the purposes of collateral estoppel, we must evaluate the legal standard the court actually applied in the prior proceeding—not the legal standard that would currently apply or even the legal standard the court should have applied.”
Archuleta v. State, 2020 UT 62, 472 P.3d 950. “” UTAH CODE § 78B-9-103. 3 ARCHULETA v. STATE Opinion of the Court punishment to execute an intellectually disabled person.”
Archuleta v. State, 2020 UT 62. “” UTAH CODE § 78B-9-103. 3 ARCHULETA v. STATE Opinion of the Court punishment to execute an intellectually disabled person.”
Gressman v. State, 2013 UT 63. “The PCRA, however, did not control the proceedings that led to the vacatur of Mr. Gressman’s conviction because the act did not go into effect until several weeks after the district court vacated the conviction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.