(a) The Supreme Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of appeals from judgments, rulings,
and orders of the Superior Court, administrative agencies, boards, commissions, and
officers unless otherwise provided by law.
(b) The Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction, concurrent with the Superior Court,
of proceedings in certiorari, mandamus, prohibition, and quo warranto and shall have
jurisdiction to issue all writs, processes, and orders that may be necessary to the
furtherance of justice and the regular execution of the law. (Amended 1971, No. 185 (Adj. Sess.), § 5, eff. March 29, 1972; 1973, No. 193 (Adj. Sess.), § 3, eff. April 9, 1974; 2009, No. 154 (Adj. Sess.), § 2.)
In re A.D.T., 817 A.2d 20 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 2דWe *375 decline to decide whether, and under what circumstances, a parent may raise an ineffective-assistance-of-eounsel claim in a termination proceeding under Title 33.”
State v. Hunt, 555 A.2d 369 (Vt. 1988). · cites it 2דII, § 30; 4 V.S.A. § 2(b). The exercise of judicial authority was unusual, called forth by unusual, indeed, hopefully unique, circumstances.”
State v. Martin, 2009 VT 15 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 2ד” 4 V.S.A. §2(b). The Vermont Constitution endows our Court with “the power to issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of its appellate jurisdiction.”
State v. Forte, 624 A.2d 352 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 2ד" 4 V.S.A. §§ 2, 113. These writs, however, were abolished by the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure.”
State v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 2008 VT 11 (Vt. 2008). “4 V.S.A. § 2. ¶ 10. The PMs argue that the VAA precludes jurisdiction in this Court to entertain an appeal by the State from the trial court’s order granting the PMs’ motion to compel arbitration in accordance with the MSA.”
Pfeil v. Rutland Dist. Court, 515 A.2d 1052 (Vt. 1986). “”); see also 4 V.S.A. §§ 2 and 113 (granting Supreme Court and the superior courts concurrent jurisdiction over proceedings in certiorari).”
In re J.G., 627 A.2d 362 (Vt. 1993). “Rev. 1165 , 1190 (1990). Our jurisdictional scheme for appeals is different from that applicable to the federal courts.”
F.E.F. v. Cameron, 594 A.2d 897 (Vt. 1991). “See 4 V.S.A. § 2(a) (Supreme Court has jurisdiction over appeals from district court); 13 V.”
Miner v. Dist. Court of Vermont, Etc., 392 A.2d 390 (Vt. 1978). · cites it 2ד75(a) is as follows: Any action or failure or refusal to act by an agency of the state or a political subdivision thereof .”
Burroughs v. West Windsor Bd. of Sch. Directors, 446 A.2d 377 (Vt. 1982). “There being no statute on point we must look to prior practice to determine the scope of review available to the plaintiff in its Rule 75 petition to the superior court.”
State v. McCann, 541 A.2d 75 (Vt. 1987). “Since our power to review a trial court determination denying interlocutory appeal is not contained within a specific statute or within the general statement of our original jurisdiction powers, it must come under our appellate jurisdiction.”
In Re Est. of Johnson, 613 A.2d 703 (Vt. 1992). “See 4 V.S.A. § 2(b) (this Court has “jurisdiction to issue all .”
In re J.G., 627 A.2d 362 (Vt. 1993). “Rev. 1165 , 1190 (1990). Our jurisdictional scheme for appeals is different from that applicable to the federal courts.”
F.E.F. v. Cameron, 594 A.2d 897 (Vt. 1991). “See 4 V.S.A. § 2(a) (Supreme Court has jurisdiction over appeals from district court); 13 V.”
State v. McCann, 541 A.2d 75 (Vt. 1987). “Since our power to review a trial court determination denying interlocutory appeal is not contained within a specific statute or within the general statement of our original jurisdiction powers, it must come under our appellate jurisdiction.”
In re A.D.T., 817 A.2d 20 (Vt. 2002). “We *375 decline to decide whether, and under what circumstances, a parent may raise an ineffective-assistance-of-eounsel claim in a termination proceeding under Title 33.”
State v. Hunt, 555 A.2d 369 (Vt. 1988). “II, § 30; 4 V.S.A. § 2(b). The exercise of judicial authority was unusual, called forth by unusual, indeed, hopefully unique, circumstances.”
State v. Martin, 2009 VT 15 (Vt. 2009). “” 4 V.S.A. §2(b). The Vermont Constitution endows our Court with “the power to issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of its appellate jurisdiction.”
Miner v. Dist. Court of Vermont, Etc., 392 A.2d 390 (Vt. 1978). “75(a) is as follows: Any action or failure or refusal to act by an agency of the state or a political subdivision thereof .”
Burroughs v. West Windsor Bd. of Sch. Directors, 446 A.2d 377 (Vt. 1982). “There being no statute on point we must look to prior practice to determine the scope of review available to the plaintiff in its Rule 75 petition to the superior court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.