Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 08, § 16 (2026)

Judicial review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 8 V.S.A. § 16)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case: In Re Cent. Vermont Med. Ctr., 816 A.2d 531 (Vt. 2002).
In Re Cent. Vermont Med. Ctr., 816 A.2d 531 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 4× “Our standard of review on appeals from orders by the Commissioner is based on 8 V.S.A. § 16, which provides that we may disturb an order by the Commissioner if it: "(1) was issued pursuant to unconstitutional statutory provisions; (2) was in excess of statutory authority; (3)…”
In Re Chatham Woods Holdings, LLC, 2008 VT 70 (Vt. 2008). “A. § 601(14)(F) 2 “ ‘employee’. . . shall not include .”
Rutland Hosp v. Gmcb (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 6× “Standard of Review This Court’s review of budget-enforcement orders issued pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 9456(h)(2)(B) “shall be on the record as developed by the Board in the administrative proceeding and the standard of review shall be as provided in 8 V.”
Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. Dep't of Banking, Ins., Sec. & Health Care Admin., 2008 VT 51 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 2× “We review appeals from decisions made by the Commissioner under 8 V.S.A. § 16. In re Central Vt. Med. Ctr.”
In Re Rutland Reg'l Med. Ctr. Fiscal Year 2025, 2025 VT 49 (Vt. 2025). “Appeal shall be on the record as developed by the Board in the administrative proceeding and the standard of review shall be as provided in 8 V.S.A. § 16.”). The Legislature has since amended § 9456(h)(2)(B)(ii) to remove the provision directing hospitals to appeal to the…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 08, § 16(2): 1 case
In Re Cent. Vermont Med. Ctr., 816 A.2d 531 (Vt. 2002). “Our standard of review on appeals from orders by the Commissioner is based on 8 V.S.A. § 16, which provides that we may disturb an order by the Commissioner if it: "(1) was issued pursuant to unconstitutional statutory provisions; (2) was in excess of statutory authority; (3)…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 08, § 16(3): 1 case
Rutland Hosp v. Gmcb (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “Standard of Review This Court’s review of budget-enforcement orders issued pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 9456(h)(2)(B) “shall be on the record as developed by the Board in the administrative proceeding and the standard of review shall be as provided in 8 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.