Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 2287 (2026)

Value

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : VOIDABLE TRANSACTIONS

(Cite as: 9 V.S.A. § 2287)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2005–2005 · leading case: Sensenich v. Molleur (In Re Chase), 328 B.R. 675 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2005).
Sensenich v. Molleur (In Re Chase), 328 B.R. 675 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2005). “9 V.S.A. § 2287(b). It is noteworthy that the Vermont statute contains no provision defining reasonably equivalent value for purposes of strict foreclosure.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 2287(b): 1 case
Sensenich v. Molleur (In Re Chase), 328 B.R. 675 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2005). “9 V.S.A. § 2287(b). It is noteworthy that the Vermont statute contains no provision defining reasonably equivalent value for purposes of strict foreclosure.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.