Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 50 (2026)

Penalties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : INTEREST GENERALLY

(Cite as: 9 V.S.A. § 50)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: Huber v. Currie (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Huber v. Currie (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 3× “Huber’s alleged misconduct, the court should not only decline to award interest at the rate specified in the note, but go beyond the statutory penalty in 9 V.S.A. § 50(b) and vacate the entire award.”
Williamson Plumbing v. Stockdale (Vt. Super. Ct. 2004). · cites it 3× “Under 9 V.S.A. § 50 there are two potential penalties.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 50(a): 1 case
Williamson Plumbing v. Stockdale (Vt. Super. Ct. 2004). “Under 9 V.S.A. § 50 there are two potential penalties.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 50(b): 2 cases
Huber v. Currie (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “Huber’s alleged misconduct, the court should not only decline to award interest at the rate specified in the note, but go beyond the statutory penalty in 9 V.S.A. § 50(b) and vacate the entire award.”
Williamson Plumbing v. Stockdale (Vt. Super. Ct. 2004). “Under 9 V.S.A. § 50 there are two potential penalties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.