Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 4765 (2026)

Damages; transfer of title pending action

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 12 V.S.A. § 4765)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2005–2025 · leading case: Kellogg v. Shushereba, 2013 VT 76 (Vt. 2013).
Kellogg v. Shushereba, 2013 VT 76 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 4× “§ 4761, with such “damages” as would be due under 12 V.S.A. § 4765. [9] We have explained that the reference to “damages” in that context refers to “mesne profits.”
Karen Wynkoop v. Gerard Stratthaus, 2016 VT 5 (Vt. 2016). “§ 5161 and compensation for ouster under 12 V.S.A. § 4765. Defendant Gerard Stratthaus appeals the trial court’s property division and compensation to plaintiff.”
Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (Vt. Super. Ct. 2005). · cites it 2× “12 V.S.A. § 4765. These will be offset by the security deposit landlord has reatined.”
leblanc v. Est. of snelgrove (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “Snelgrove, 2015 VT 112, ¶ 58 (noting that the fourth element of an unlawful mischief requires the establishment of damages); 12 V.S.A. § 4765; Kellogg v. Shushereba, 2013 VT 76, ¶ 23 (noting that damages under an action for ejectment are mesne profits); Bean v.”
Est. of Donald Crofut v. Sean Hammond (Vt. 2024). “§ 4761, with such ‘damages’ as would be due under 12 V.S.A. § 4765”); see also 12 V.S.A. § 4761 (“A person having claim to the seisin or possession of lands, tenements, or hereditaments shall have an action of ejectment, according to the nature of the case .”
Kelley v. Kelley (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “§ 4761, with such ‘damages’ as would be due under 12 V.S.A. § 4765,” as “measured by the rental value of the premises” and any other “gains prevented” or “losses sustained.”
Eastman v. Morrill (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “§ 4761, with such ‘damages' as would be due under 12 V.S.A. § 4765,” as “measured by the rental value of the premises” and any other “gains prevented” or “losses sustained.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.