Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 12 Chapter 172
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 4952 (2026)

Sale procedures

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : FORECLOSURE BY JUDICIAL SALE

(Cite as: 12 V.S.A. § 4952)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2026 · leading case: HSBC Bank USA N.A. (Jeffrey C. Riley, Appellant) v. Scott A. McAllister & Eddy Mulder, 182 A.3d 593 (Vt. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
HSBC Bank USA N.A. (Jeffrey C. Riley, Appellant) v. Scott A. McAllister & Eddy Mulder, 182 A.3d 593 (Vt. 2018). “Once the redemption period lapsed, bank organized a public auction of the property in accordance with the foreclosure judgment and 12 V.S.A. § 4952. Bank retained an auctioneer to conduct the auction.”
Cws Investments v. Dydo (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 4× “Defendant objects on two grounds: (1) the applicable statute, 12 V.S.A. § 4952, requires that a notice of foreclosure sale accurately state the amount to be paid by the purchaser to the auctioneer at the time of the scheduled sale, and Plaintiffs notice breached that requirement…”
Bank of New York Mellon v. Peter Campbell (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). · cites it 5× “” 12 V.S.A. § 4952(a). Thus an argument can be made that if an auctioneer has limited authority to bid for a plaintiff at a sale, an auctioneer should be able to act in limited ways on behalf of a plaintiff.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 4952(a): 1 case
Bank of New York Mellon v. Peter Campbell (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “” 12 V.S.A. § 4952(a). Thus an argument can be made that if an auctioneer has limited authority to bid for a plaintiff at a sale, an auctioneer should be able to act in limited ways on behalf of a plaintiff.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 4952(b): 1 case
Bank of New York Mellon v. Peter Campbell (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “” 12 V.S.A. § 4952(a). Thus an argument can be made that if an auctioneer has limited authority to bid for a plaintiff at a sale, an auctioneer should be able to act in limited ways on behalf of a plaintiff.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 4952(c): 1 case
Bank of New York Mellon v. Peter Campbell (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “” 12 V.S.A. § 4952(a). Thus an argument can be made that if an auctioneer has limited authority to bid for a plaintiff at a sale, an auctioneer should be able to act in limited ways on behalf of a plaintiff.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 4952(e): 2 cases
Cws Investments v. Dydo (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “Defendant objects on two grounds: (1) the applicable statute, 12 V.S.A. § 4952, requires that a notice of foreclosure sale accurately state the amount to be paid by the purchaser to the auctioneer at the time of the scheduled sale, and Plaintiffs notice breached that requirement…”
Bank of New York Mellon v. Peter Campbell (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “” 12 V.S.A. § 4952(a). Thus an argument can be made that if an auctioneer has limited authority to bid for a plaintiff at a sale, an auctioneer should be able to act in limited ways on behalf of a plaintiff.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.