The making of an agreement to arbitrate which is subject to this chapter confers jurisdiction
on the Superior Court for proceedings under this chapter. Except where the context
requires a broader reading, the term “court” as used in this chapter means the Superior
Court. In relation to any such agreement to arbitrate, the court may enter any one
or more orders:
(1) to compel a person to proceed with arbitration;
(2) to stay arbitration;
(3) to appoint arbitrators;
(4) to enforce a subpoena issued by arbitrators;
(5) to direct arbitrators to proceed with hearings or to make an award;
(6) to confirm an award of arbitrators;
(7) to vacate an award;
(8) to modify an award or to submit to arbitrators to consider modifying an award; and
(9) to enter judgment on the award. (Added 1985, No. 95, § 2.)
Lamell Lumber Corp. v. NEWSTRESS INTERN., 2007 VT 83 (Vt. 2007). “12 V.S.A. § 5671. Defendant claims that § 5671 effectively limits or "demarcates the parameters of the superior court's jurisdiction" and by implication divests the court of other authority.”
O'Rourke v. Lunde & The Hous. Grp. Ltd. P'ship, 2014 VT 88 (Vt. 2014). “” 12 V.S.A. § 5671. First, as argued by Lunde and discussed below, the YAA does not apply to this agreement, which was entered into prior to the effective date of the YAA.”
Lamell Lumber Corp. v. Newstress Int'l, Inc., 182 Vt. 282 (Vt. 2007). “12 V.S.A. § 5671. Defendant claims that § 5671 effectively limits or “demarcates the parameters of the superior court’s jurisdiction” and by implication divests the court of other authority.”
In Re Shelburne Supermarket, Inc., 2010 VT 30 (Vt. 2010). “12 V.S.A. § 5671 (describing superior court’s jurisdiction relevant to its review of arbitration awards).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.