Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 5254 (2026)

Personnel designation and expenditures

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : OFFICE OF DEFENDER GENERAL

(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 5254)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1992–2017 · leading case: Bradshaw v. Joseph, 666 A.2d 1175 (Vt. 1995).
Bradshaw v. Joseph, 666 A.2d 1175 (Vt. 1995). “Although exempted from classified state service, see 13 V.S.A. § 5254(a), the origin, function and funding of public defenders lead us to conclude that they are state employees and, as such, 12 V.”
Warren v. Stone, 958 F.2d 1419 (7th Cir. 1992). “In support of its position, the dissent relies on the text and legislative history of the 1991 amendments to the public defender enabling act.”
Godin v. Corr. Corp. of Am. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “154, 156 (1995) (“Although exempted from classified state service, see 13 V.S.A. § 5254 (a), the origin, function and funding of public defenders lead us to conclude that they are state employees and, as such, 12 V.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 5254(a): 1 case
Bradshaw v. Joseph, 666 A.2d 1175 (Vt. 1995). “Although exempted from classified state service, see 13 V.S.A. § 5254(a), the origin, function and funding of public defenders lead us to conclude that they are state employees and, as such, 12 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.