§ 7562. Relief of bail—warrant to arrest and commit
If a surety or a person who has posted bail wishes to surrender the principal in discharge
of the person’s obligations under the bond or bail agreement, the person may apply
in writing to a judicial officer, as defined in subsection 7554(f) of this title, for a warrant to apprehend and detain the principal. The court shall, absent good
cause shown, thereupon issue such warrant, and on detention of the principal, the
person’s obligation under the bond or bail agreement shall be discharged. (Amended 2001, No. 124 (Adj. Sess.), § 6, eff. June 5, 2002.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1979–2015 · leading case: State v. Marsh, 789 A.2d 939 (Vt. 2001).
State v. Marsh, 789 A.2d 939 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 2דTitle 13 V.S.A §7562 grants surety the right to apply for a warrant to apprehend defendant, return him to the appropriate authority and recover the bail.”
State v. Fernald, 723 A.2d 1145 (Vt. 1998). · cites it 2דShelley Palmer appeals from the Rutland District Court’s denial of his request for a bail warrant and discharge as surety for Michael Fernald, pursuant to 13 VS.A. § 7562, upon Palmer’s surrender of Fernald to the court.”
In Re Zera, 406 A.2d 396 (Vt. 1979). “On January 5, 1978, the petitioner filed a Notice of Relief of Bail wherein he formally notified the court of his surrender and requested an order committing him to the custody of the Commissioner of Corrections pending the suit pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 7562. On March 10, 1978,…”
State v. Mottolese, 2015 VT 81, 124 A.3d 809. · cites it 2דA hearing on the motion was held March 25, 2014, but after Allstate suggested it would seek a surety warrant, the court continued the hearing to May.”
State v. Mottolese, 199 Vt. 470 (Vt. 2015). · cites it 2דSee 13 V.S.A. § 7562. On May 2, 2014, the court denied the request, stating that under State v.”
State v. Mottolese, 199 Vt. 470 (Vt. 2015). · cites it 2דSee 13 V.S.A. § 7562. On May 2, 2014, the court denied the request, stating that under State v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.