Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 14 Chapter 101
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2108 (2026)

How prosecuted

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 14 V.S.A. § 2108)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2025–2026 · leading case: In Re Miriam Thomas (Paul Thomas, Appellant), 2026 VT 12 (Vt. 2026).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Miriam Thomas (Paul Thomas, Appellant), 2026 VT 12 (Vt. 2026). · cites it 4× “Finally, the probate division indicated that Paul had not yet been discharged and specified that Miriam’s representative “may prosecute the bond pursuant to the procedures contained in 14 V.S.A. § 2108,” and that, after Paul paid the 6 monies due and the court settled his final…”
In Re Thomas (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 4× “It also noted that the Consolidated Final Judgment did “not discharge Paul Thomas as former guardian of the Ward,” and that, following its entry, “the Ward’s representative may prosecute the bond pursuant to the procedures contained in 14 V.S.A. § 2108.” Id. at 2. Paul now…”
In Re Thomas (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “1 The Court also continues to find persuasive its explanation of the interplay between the statutes it relied upon to sanction the probate division’s action and the other types of civil prosecutions authorized by bond in 14 V.S.A. § 2108. But, other reasonable interpretations of…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2108(1): 2 cases
In Re Miriam Thomas (Paul Thomas, Appellant), 2026 VT 12 (Vt. 2026). “Finally, the probate division indicated that Paul had not yet been discharged and specified that Miriam’s representative “may prosecute the bond pursuant to the procedures contained in 14 V.S.A. § 2108,” and that, after Paul paid the 6 monies due and the court settled his final…”
In Re Thomas (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “It also noted that the Consolidated Final Judgment did “not discharge Paul Thomas as former guardian of the Ward,” and that, following its entry, “the Ward’s representative may prosecute the bond pursuant to the procedures contained in 14 V.S.A. § 2108.” Id. at 2. Paul now…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2108(2): 1 case
In Re Miriam Thomas (Paul Thomas, Appellant), 2026 VT 12 (Vt. 2026). “Finally, the probate division indicated that Paul had not yet been discharged and specified that Miriam’s representative “may prosecute the bond pursuant to the procedures contained in 14 V.S.A. § 2108,” and that, after Paul paid the 6 monies due and the court settled his final…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 2108(7): 1 case
In Re Thomas (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “It also noted that the Consolidated Final Judgment did “not discharge Paul Thomas as former guardian of the Ward,” and that, following its entry, “the Ward’s representative may prosecute the bond pursuant to the procedures contained in 14 V.S.A. § 2108.” Id. at 2. Paul now…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.