Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 4000 (2026)

Statement of policy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 16 V.S.A. § 4000)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Town of Killington v. State, 776 A.2d 395 (Vt. 2001).
Town of Killington v. State, 776 A.2d 395 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 2× “enter summary judgment in favor of the State based on our conclusion that the court’s construction of the statutory provision at issue leads to an irrational result that is inconsistent with the spirit of the law and the legislative intent underlying the provision. The…”
Sadie Boyd, Madeline Klein & Town of Whitingham v. State, 2022 VT 12 (Vt. 2022). “” 16 V.S.A. § 4000(a). Chapter II, § 68 of the Vermont Constitution, known as the Education Clause, makes education “a fundamental obligation of the state.”
Stowe Citizens for Responsible Gov't v. State, 730 A.2d 573 (Vt. 1999). · cites it 2× “The Act aimed to provide school districts with substantially equal access to similar per-pupil revenues through a combination of state block grants and local education spending. See 16 VS.A. § 4000(b) (statement of policy).”
Anderson v. State, 723 A.2d 1147 (Vt. 1998). “16 VS.A. § 4000(a). According to the Legislature’s statement of purpose, “[sjubstantially equal access to similar revenues per pupil will be provided by a combination of state block grants and local education spending.”
Michele Morin & Karen Rowell v. City of Burlington, 2026 VT 17 (Vt. 2026). “60, § 18; 16 V.S.A. § 4000(a). “From the broadest perspective,” Act 60 represented the Legislature’s attempt “to rectify the inequality in educational opportunity in Vermont resulting from the state’s heavy reliance on local property taxes to fund schools.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 4000(a): 5 cases
Town of Killington v. State, 776 A.2d 395 (Vt. 2001). “enter summary judgment in favor of the State based on our conclusion that the court’s construction of the statutory provision at issue leads to an irrational result that is inconsistent with the spirit of the law and the legislative intent underlying the provision. The…”
Sadie Boyd, Madeline Klein & Town of Whitingham v. State, 2022 VT 12 (Vt. 2022). “” 16 V.S.A. § 4000(a). Chapter II, § 68 of the Vermont Constitution, known as the Education Clause, makes education “a fundamental obligation of the state.”
Anderson v. State, 723 A.2d 1147 (Vt. 1998). “16 VS.A. § 4000(a). According to the Legislature’s statement of purpose, “[sjubstantially equal access to similar revenues per pupil will be provided by a combination of state block grants and local education spending.”
Stowe Citizens for Responsible Gov't v. State, 730 A.2d 573 (Vt. 1999). “The Act aimed to provide school districts with substantially equal access to similar per-pupil revenues through a combination of state block grants and local education spending. See 16 VS.A. § 4000(b) (statement of policy).”
Michele Morin & Karen Rowell v. City of Burlington, 2026 VT 17 (Vt. 2026). “60, § 18; 16 V.S.A. § 4000(a). “From the broadest perspective,” Act 60 represented the Legislature’s attempt “to rectify the inequality in educational opportunity in Vermont resulting from the state’s heavy reliance on local property taxes to fund schools.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 4000(b): 2 cases
Town of Killington v. State, 776 A.2d 395 (Vt. 2001). “enter summary judgment in favor of the State based on our conclusion that the court’s construction of the statutory provision at issue leads to an irrational result that is inconsistent with the spirit of the law and the legislative intent underlying the provision. The…”
Stowe Citizens for Responsible Gov't v. State, 730 A.2d 573 (Vt. 1999). “The Act aimed to provide school districts with substantially equal access to similar per-pupil revenues through a combination of state block grants and local education spending. See 16 VS.A. § 4000(b) (statement of policy).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.