(1) “Affidavit” means the Vermont campaign finance affidavit required under section 2982
of this chapter.
(2) “General election period” means the period beginning the day after the primary election
and ending the day of the general election.
(3) “Primary election period” means the period beginning the day after primary petitions
must be filed under section 2356 of this title and ending the day of the primary election.
(4) “Vermont campaign finance qualification period” means the period beginning February
15 of each even-numbered year and ending on the date on which primary petitions must
be filed under section 2356 of this title. (Added 2013, No. 90 (Adj. Sess.), § 3, eff. Jan. 23, 2014.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2016–2018 · leading case: Corren v. Condos, 898 F.3d 209 (2d Cir. 2018).
Corren v. Condos, 898 F.3d 209 (2d Cir. 2018). · cites it 2דIn particular, appellants challenged provisions that prohibit publicly financed candidates ("PFCs") from (1) accepting more than a specified amount of campaign contributions, which are defined to include (with some exceptions) expenditures made by political parties in…”
Corren v. Sorrell, 167 F. Supp. 3d 647 (D. Vt. 2016). “In the 2016 election cycle, candidates may not declare their desire for public financing prior to February 15, 2016. After February 15, candidates may solicit $50 donations in an effort to meet the minimum of $17,500 during the campaign finance qualification period.”
State v. Corren (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “Corren sought and received public funding for the 2014 lieutenant governor race pursuant to 17 V.S.A. §§ 2981–2986 (public financing option).”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 2981(4): 1 case
Corren v. Sorrell, 167 F. Supp. 3d 647 (D. Vt. 2016). “In the 2016 election cycle, candidates may not declare their desire for public financing prior to February 15, 2016. After February 15, candidates may solicit $50 donations in an effort to meet the minimum of $17,500 during the campaign finance qualification period.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.