Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4201 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : REGULATED DRUGS

(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 4201)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2021 · leading case: Sandra Baird & Jared Carter, 2016 VT 6 (Vt. 2016).
Sandra Baird & Jared Carter, 2016 VT 6 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 2× “See 18 V.S.A. § 4201(29) (defining “regulated drug”); 18 V.”
State v. Connarn, 413 A.2d 812 (Vt. 1980). · cites it 5× “§ 4202 authorizes the State Board of Health to adopt regulations classifying drugs as “regulated drugs” within the definition of 18 V.S.A. § 4201(29), and “depressant or stimulant drugs” within the definition of 18 V.”
State v. McAllister, 2008 VT 3 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 2× “18 V.S.A. § 4201(29). ¶ 17. There are two types of evidence in every case from which a jury may find the truth.”
State v. Bressette, 388 A.2d 395 (Vt. 1978). · cites it 2× “The parties have focused their appellate attention upon the definition of “sale” contained in 18 V.S.A. § 4201 (30), and applicable to § 4224(g), under which the information here was brought.”
State v. Thomas, 565 A.2d 1335 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 4× “Defendant next argues that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the substance found in his possession was a regulated narcotic drug as defined in 18 V.S.A. § 4201(16), because its witness did not testify to the precise chemical composition of the substance…”
State v. Francis, 568 A.2d 389 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 2× ““Dispense” is defined in 18 V.S.A. § 4201(7) as including “distribute, leave with, give away, dispose of, or deliver.”
Ritchie v. State of Vermont (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). · cites it 2× “§ 1200(2)(a) (defining “drug” to include regulated drugs listed at 18 V.S.A. § 4201); 18 V.S.A. § 4201(29)(E) (defining “regulated drug” to include “marijuana”).”
Abrell v. Dep't of Motor Vehs. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 2× “§ 1200(2) (defining “drug” to include regulated drugs under 18 V.S.A. § 4201); 18 V.S.A. § 4201(15) (defining marijuana to be such a regulated drug).”
State v. Henry Nash (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “See 18 V.S.A. § 4201(29) (defining “regulated drug” as narcotics, depressants or stimulants, hallucinogens, ecstasy, marijuana, or methamphetamine).”
State v. James King (Vt. 2015). “” The penalty that results for possession of differing amounts of marijuana is separate from the question of whether marijuana is a regulated drug. The State was not required to prove that defendant’s possession was criminal, merely that the substance he possessed was a…”
State v. Metivier, 596 A.2d 352 (Vt. 1991). “The crux of defendant’s argument is that pursuant to the clear language of 18 V.S.A. § 4201(16) only substances designated as narcotic drugs by regulations adopted by the Board of Health are narcotic drugs and that because the State did not introduce the regulations adopted by…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4201(15) — 1 case
Abrell v. Dep't of Motor Vehs. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “§ 1200(2) (defining “drug” to include regulated drugs under 18 V.S.A. § 4201); 18 V.S.A. § 4201(15) (defining marijuana to be such a regulated drug).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4201(16) — 2 cases
State v. Thomas, 565 A.2d 1335 (Vt. 1989). “Defendant next argues that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the substance found in his possession was a regulated narcotic drug as defined in 18 V.S.A. § 4201(16), because its witness did not testify to the precise chemical composition of the substance…”
State v. Metivier, 596 A.2d 352 (Vt. 1991). “The crux of defendant’s argument is that pursuant to the clear language of 18 V.S.A. § 4201(16) only substances designated as narcotic drugs by regulations adopted by the Board of Health are narcotic drugs and that because the State did not introduce the regulations adopted by…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4201(29) — 4 cases
Sandra Baird & Jared Carter, 2016 VT 6 (Vt. 2016). “See 18 V.S.A. § 4201(29) (defining “regulated drug”); 18 V.”
State v. Connarn, 413 A.2d 812 (Vt. 1980). “§ 4202 authorizes the State Board of Health to adopt regulations classifying drugs as “regulated drugs” within the definition of 18 V.S.A. § 4201(29), and “depressant or stimulant drugs” within the definition of 18 V.”
State v. McAllister, 2008 VT 3 (Vt. 2008). “18 V.S.A. § 4201(29). ¶ 17. There are two types of evidence in every case from which a jury may find the truth.”
State v. Henry Nash (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “See 18 V.S.A. § 4201(29) (defining “regulated drug” as narcotics, depressants or stimulants, hallucinogens, ecstasy, marijuana, or methamphetamine).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4201(29)(A) — 1 case
State v. McAllister, 2008 VT 3 (Vt. 2008). “18 V.S.A. § 4201(29). ¶ 17. There are two types of evidence in every case from which a jury may find the truth.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4201(29)(E) — 2 cases
Ritchie v. State of Vermont (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). “§ 1200(2)(a) (defining “drug” to include regulated drugs listed at 18 V.S.A. § 4201); 18 V.S.A. § 4201(29)(E) (defining “regulated drug” to include “marijuana”).”
State v. James King (Vt. 2015). “” The penalty that results for possession of differing amounts of marijuana is separate from the question of whether marijuana is a regulated drug. The State was not required to prove that defendant’s possession was criminal, merely that the substance he possessed was a…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4201(6) — 1 case
State v. Connarn, 413 A.2d 812 (Vt. 1980). “§ 4202 authorizes the State Board of Health to adopt regulations classifying drugs as “regulated drugs” within the definition of 18 V.S.A. § 4201(29), and “depressant or stimulant drugs” within the definition of 18 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4201(7) — 1 case
State v. Francis, 568 A.2d 389 (Vt. 1989). ““Dispense” is defined in 18 V.S.A. § 4201(7) as including “distribute, leave with, give away, dispose of, or deliver.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4201(80) — 1 case
State v. Bressette, 388 A.2d 395 (Vt. 1978). “The parties have focused their appellate attention upon the definition of “sale” contained in 18 V.S.A. § 4201 (30), and applicable to § 4224(g), under which the information here was brought.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.