Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 9444 (2026)

Revocation of certificates; material change

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 005 : HEALTH FACILITY PLANNING

(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 9444)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–2020 · leading case: In Re Prof'l Nurses Serv., Inc., 671 A.2d 1289 (Vt. 1996).
In Re Prof'l Nurses Serv., Inc., 671 A.2d 1289 (Vt. 1996). · cites it 4× “§ 9444, “[t]he board may revoke a certificate of need for substantial noneompliance with the scope of the project as designated in the application, or for failure to comply with the conditions set forth in the certificate of need granted by the board.” The Board found that PNS’s…”
In re ACTD LLC, d/b/a The Green Mountain Surgery Ctr., 2020 VT 89 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 5× “§ 9440(d)(4); Green Mountain Care Board Rule 4.500. The Board may revoke a CON for substantial noncompliance with the scope of the project as set forth in the application, or for failure to comply with conditions in the CON.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 9444(a): 1 case
In re ACTD LLC, d/b/a The Green Mountain Surgery Ctr., 2020 VT 89 (Vt. 2020). “§ 9440(d)(4); Green Mountain Care Board Rule 4.500. The Board may revoke a CON for substantial noncompliance with the scope of the project as set forth in the application, or for failure to comply with conditions in the CON.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 9444(b): 1 case
In re ACTD LLC, d/b/a The Green Mountain Surgery Ctr., 2020 VT 89 (Vt. 2020). “§ 9440(d)(4); Green Mountain Care Board Rule 4.500. The Board may revoke a CON for substantial noncompliance with the scope of the project as set forth in the application, or for failure to comply with conditions in the CON.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 9444(b)(2): 1 case
In re ACTD LLC, d/b/a The Green Mountain Surgery Ctr., 2020 VT 89 (Vt. 2020). “§ 9440(d)(4); Green Mountain Care Board Rule 4.500. The Board may revoke a CON for substantial noncompliance with the scope of the project as set forth in the application, or for failure to comply with conditions in the CON.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.