§ 512. Payment following decision on damages; credit of State pledged
(a) Within 30 days of a final decision on damages and the exhaustion or expiration of
all appeal rights, the Agency shall pay or tender the owner the amount, if any, by
which the award to the person exceeds the amount previously paid or tendered by the
Agency.
(b), (c) [Repealed.]
(d) The credit of the State of Vermont is pledged to the payment of all amounts awarded
or allowed under the provisions of the chapter, and these amounts shall be lawful
obligations of the State of Vermont. (Added 1985, No. 269 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; amended 1993, No. 172 (Adj. Sess.), § 25; 2009, No. 123 (Adj. Sess.), § 50; 2011, No. 126 (Adj. Sess.), § 2.)
Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow, 762 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2000). · cites it 2דRohan, Powell on Real Property § 79B.06[1] (1999) (substantial interference with abutting property owner's right of access to public roadway supports action for inverse condemnation).”
Raymond v. Chittenden Cnty. Circumferential High., 604 A.2d 1281 (Vt. 1992). · cites it 2ד*106 Finally, plaintiffs argue that the court erred in failing to award them attorney’s fees and other litigation expenses under either 19 V.S.A. § 512(b) or § 514. Section 512(b) applies, however, only where “the plaintiff prevails against the state in an action for inverse…”
Mazza v. Agency of Transp., 716 A.2d 817 (Vt. 1998). “, the transportation board’s obligation to pay “each person from whom land or rights are taken,” 19 V.S.A. § 512(a), contemplates a payment to the landowner, again irrespective of the ownership of the business.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 19, § 512(a) — 1 case
Mazza v. Agency of Transp., 716 A.2d 817 (Vt. 1998). “, the transportation board’s obligation to pay “each person from whom land or rights are taken,” 19 V.S.A. § 512(a), contemplates a payment to the landowner, again irrespective of the ownership of the business.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 19, § 512(b) — 2 cases
Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow, 762 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2000). “Rohan, Powell on Real Property § 79B.06[1] (1999) (substantial interference with abutting property owner's right of access to public roadway supports action for inverse condemnation).”
Raymond v. Chittenden Cnty. Circumferential High., 604 A.2d 1281 (Vt. 1992). “*106 Finally, plaintiffs argue that the court erred in failing to award them attorney’s fees and other litigation expenses under either 19 V.S.A. § 512(b) or § 514. Section 512(b) applies, however, only where “the plaintiff prevails against the state in an action for inverse…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.