Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 20 Chapter 113
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1880 (2026)

Disciplinary procedures

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 20 V.S.A. § 1880)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1979–2003 · leading case: In Re Grievance of Danforth, 812 A.2d 845 (Vt. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Grievance of Danforth, 812 A.2d 845 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 42× “The commissioner of the Department delivered formal written charges to Danforth pursuant to 20 V.S.A. § 1880, advising that her actions during the IAU investigation violated the Department's code of conduct.”
Reed v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 398 A.2d 301 (Vt. 1979). “20 V.S.A. § 1880. The statute does not require a hearing in employee grievances, including those relating to promotion.”
In re Appeal of Madore, 2003 VT 35 (Vt. 2003). “On January 5, 2001, appellee appealed his dismissal to the Labor Relations Board, pursuant to 20 V.S.A. § 1880(c). In that appeal, appellee asked the Board to reverse his dismissal on the ground that the Commissioner violated Article 14 of the collective bargaining agreement…”
In re Kennedy, 592 A.2d 893 (Vt. 1991). “The district court granted appellee’s motion to dismiss on the ground that its involvement in the statutory scheme for discipline of state police officers under 20 V.S.A. § 1880 was unconstitutional under In re Williams, 154 Vt.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1880(b): 1 case
In Re Grievance of Danforth, 812 A.2d 845 (Vt. 2002). “The commissioner of the Department delivered formal written charges to Danforth pursuant to 20 V.S.A. § 1880, advising that her actions during the IAU investigation violated the Department's code of conduct.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1880(c): 2 cases
In Re Grievance of Danforth, 812 A.2d 845 (Vt. 2002). “The commissioner of the Department delivered formal written charges to Danforth pursuant to 20 V.S.A. § 1880, advising that her actions during the IAU investigation violated the Department's code of conduct.”
In re Appeal of Madore, 2003 VT 35 (Vt. 2003). “On January 5, 2001, appellee appealed his dismissal to the Labor Relations Board, pursuant to 20 V.S.A. § 1880(c). In that appeal, appellee asked the Board to reverse his dismissal on the ground that the Commissioner violated Article 14 of the collective bargaining agreement…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1880(f): 1 case
In Re Grievance of Danforth, 812 A.2d 845 (Vt. 2002). “The commissioner of the Department delivered formal written charges to Danforth pursuant to 20 V.S.A. § 1880, advising that her actions during the IAU investigation violated the Department's code of conduct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.