Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1325 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL BENEFITS

(Cite as: 21 V.S.A. § 1325)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2024 · leading case: Holton v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 2005 VT 42 (Vt. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Holton v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 2005 VT 42 (Vt. 2005). · cites it 2× “21 V.S.A. § 1325. ¶ 12. The second option, open only to governmental employers and nonprofit corporations, is to be a noncontributing employer.”
In re Loyal Order of Moose, Inc., Lodge 1090, 2005 VT 31 (Vt. 2005). · cites it 13× “The experience-rating record of a base-period employer is not charged, however, if “as of the date on which the individual filed an initial claim for benefits, the individual’s employment with that employer had not been terminated or reduced in hours.”
Anthony Adams AIA Architect v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 430 A.2d 446 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 2× “21 V.S.A. § 1325(a). The plaintiff and the employee involved here agreed at the time of hiring that it would be for a temporary assignment of four to six weeks.”
Sirloin Saloon of Shelburne, Rutland, & Manchester, Inc. v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 558 A.2d 226 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 2× “That exception is contained in 21 V.S.A. § 1325(b) and applies to a “successor” corporation.”
Chittenden Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. Dep't of Labor, 2020 VT 4 (Vt. 2020). “(citing 21 V.S.A. § 1325). ¶ 11. However, municipalities, State institutions of higher education, and political or governmental subdivisions or instrumentalities of the State may elect to forgo unemployment tax payments in favor of an arrangement whereby claims awarded to their…”
Littlefield v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 487 A.2d 507 (Vt. 1984). “We therefore hold that an employing unit cannot become the last employing unit for any particular employee until that employing unit becomes responsible for any subsequent unemployment benefits claimed by that employee, pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 1325. Because the claimant in the…”
Wallace v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 365 A.2d 517 (Vt. 1976). “In order to promote a policy which is ultimately for the benefit of employers as well as employees, we find that an employee, undertaking unsuitable employment, is entitled to a trial period of no longer than the time required to make his benefits chargeable to the second…”
Trombley v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 503 A.2d 537 (Vt. 1985). · cites it 2× “*334 Appellant argues that 21 V.S.A. § 1325(a)(1) governs the issue in the case.”
Longe v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 380 A.2d 76 (Vt. 1977). “21 V.S.A. § 1325. In summary, we hold that where the Board, acting solely upon the record, sustained a conclusion below upon completely new grounds supported only by double hearsay put in evidence by an interested witness, and established a negative fact contradicted by the only…”
In Re Hatch, 290 A.2d 180 (Vt. 1972). “” By 21 V.S.A. § 1325 “[Bjenefits paid to an eligible individual shall be charged *257 against the experience-rating record of his then most recent subject employer from whom he has received $595.”
Hunt v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 453 A.2d 391 (Vt. 1982). “See 21 V.S.A. § 1325. The policy of the statute is that the employers are, by and large, in a better position to bear a share of the economic cost than are individual workers, and the penalty assessments may tend to prevent casual lay-off decisions.”
Habel v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 507 A.2d 973 (Vt. 1986). · cites it 3× “§ 1344(a)(3), “an employing unit cannot become the last employing unit for any particular employee until that employing unit becomes responsible for any subsequent unemployment benefits claimed by that employee, pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 1325.” Colonial was not yet responsible for…”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1325(a) — 2 cases
Anthony Adams AIA Architect v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 430 A.2d 446 (Vt. 1981). “21 V.S.A. § 1325(a). The plaintiff and the employee involved here agreed at the time of hiring that it would be for a temporary assignment of four to six weeks.”
Wallace v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 365 A.2d 517 (Vt. 1976). “In order to promote a policy which is ultimately for the benefit of employers as well as employees, we find that an employee, undertaking unsuitable employment, is entitled to a trial period of no longer than the time required to make his benefits chargeable to the second…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1325(a)(1) — 1 case
Trombley v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 503 A.2d 537 (Vt. 1985). “*334 Appellant argues that 21 V.S.A. § 1325(a)(1) governs the issue in the case.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1325(b) — 1 case
Sirloin Saloon of Shelburne, Rutland, & Manchester, Inc. v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 558 A.2d 226 (Vt. 1989). “That exception is contained in 21 V.S.A. § 1325(b) and applies to a “successor” corporation.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1325(b)(1) — 2 cases
Moretown Milling LLC v. Dep't of Labor (Vt. 2023).
Advanced Power Conversion Solutions Inc. v. Dep't of Labor (Vt. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1325(f) — 1 case
In re Loyal Order of Moose, Inc., Lodge 1090, 2005 VT 31 (Vt. 2005). “The experience-rating record of a base-period employer is not charged, however, if “as of the date on which the individual filed an initial claim for benefits, the individual’s employment with that employer had not been terminated or reduced in hours.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1325(f)(3) — 1 case
In re Loyal Order of Moose, Inc., Lodge 1090, 2005 VT 31 (Vt. 2005). “The experience-rating record of a base-period employer is not charged, however, if “as of the date on which the individual filed an initial claim for benefits, the individual’s employment with that employer had not been terminated or reduced in hours.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.