(a) An employer shall not discharge or in any other manner retaliate against an employee
because:
(1) the employee lodged a complaint of a violation of this subchapter;
(2) the employee has cooperated with the Commissioner in an investigation of a violation
of this subchapter; or
(3) the employer believes that the employee may lodge a complaint or cooperate in an investigation
of a violation of this subchapter.
(b) Any person aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action in the Civil
Division of the Superior Court seeking compensatory and punitive damages or equitable
relief, including restraint of prohibited acts, restitution of wages or benefits,
reinstatement, costs, reasonable attorney’s fees, and other appropriate relief. (Added 2013, No. 15, § 8.)
McCullough v. Fed. Express Corp. (D. Vt. 2023). · cites it 5דWhether Defendant Is Entitled to Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Retaliation Claim Under 21 V.S.A. § 348. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint alleges a single claim of illegal retaliation in violation of “Vermont’s Fair Employment Practices Act ~ 21 V.”
Maynus v. State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 2דIt has specifically moved to dismiss Count 3, alleging that Maynus has failed to state a retaliation claim under 21 V.S.A. § 348. Mot. at 7–9. In addition, the State has moved under Rule 12(b)(1) to dismiss: (a) Count 2, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, Mot.”
bockus v. maple pro (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “His complaining about his wages is clearly protected activity under 21 V.S.A. § 348(a)(1). Maple Pro responded to that complaint the same day.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 348(a)(1): 1 case
bockus v. maple pro (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “His complaining about his wages is clearly protected activity under 21 V.S.A. § 348(a)(1). Maple Pro responded to that complaint the same day.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.