Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 471 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004A : PARENTAL AND FAMILY LEAVE

(Cite as: 21 V.S.A. § 471)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2021 · leading case: Woolaver v. State, 2003 VT 71 (Vt. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Woolaver v. State, 2003 VT 71 (Vt. 2003). · cites it 2× “First, the court found that plaintiff was not entitled to leave pursuant to the PFLA because she had not worked in her position as Business Manager/Personnel Manager for the Department for the one-year period required to qualify as an employee pursuant to the PFLA citing 21…”
State v. Weaver, 2015 VT 44 (Vt. 2015). “1327 (2012); 21 V.S.A. §§ 471(3), 472(a) (defining “family leave” and listing reasons for which employee is entitled to take family leave under Vermont law).”
Gates v. MacK Molding Co., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). · cites it 2× “§ 471(2), in that she was continuously employed by Defendant for one year for an average of at least 30 hours per week during the year; (2) that Defendant was an “employer” as defined at 21 V.”
Cheney v. New England Newspapers, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “She then brought this lawsuit, asserting four counts: (1) violation of the Vermont Parental and Family Leave Act (VtPFLA), 21 V.S.A. § 471; (2) violation of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 471(1) — 1 case
Gates v. MacK Molding Co., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). “§ 471(2), in that she was continuously employed by Defendant for one year for an average of at least 30 hours per week during the year; (2) that Defendant was an “employer” as defined at 21 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 471(2) — 2 cases
Woolaver v. State, 2003 VT 71 (Vt. 2003). “First, the court found that plaintiff was not entitled to leave pursuant to the PFLA because she had not worked in her position as Business Manager/Personnel Manager for the Department for the one-year period required to qualify as an employee pursuant to the PFLA citing 21…”
Gates v. MacK Molding Co., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). “§ 471(2), in that she was continuously employed by Defendant for one year for an average of at least 30 hours per week during the year; (2) that Defendant was an “employer” as defined at 21 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 471(3) — 1 case
State v. Weaver, 2015 VT 44 (Vt. 2015). “1327 (2012); 21 V.S.A. §§ 471(3), 472(a) (defining “family leave” and listing reasons for which employee is entitled to take family leave under Vermont law).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.