Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 21 Chapter 9
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 642 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 21 V.S.A. § 642)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1962–2021 · leading case: Montgomery v. Brinver Corp., 457 A.2d 644 (Vt. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Montgomery v. Brinver Corp., 457 A.2d 644 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 5× “§§ 663, 664, claiming that the payments, pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 642(a) and to the agreement, should continue until the disability ended.”
Lydy v. Trustaff, Inc./Wausau Ins. Co., 2013 VT 44 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 2× “See 21 V.S.A. § 642 (subject to statutory minimum and maximum and adjustment for dependents, temporary total disability benefit is two-thirds of average weekly wage); id .”
Wood v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, 739 A.2d 1201 (Vt. 1999). · cites it 2× “See 21 V.S.A. § 642 (providing for such benefits “ [wjhere the injury causes total disability for work”).”
Wolfe v. Yudichak, 571 A.2d 592 (Vt. 1990). · cites it 2× “The majority points to the benefit provisions of the statute, 21 V.S.A. §§ 642, 645, 650(a), to demonstrate that plaintiff is not entitled to compensation for his lost wages under the statute.”
Lavalley v. E.B. & A.C. Whiting Co., 692 A.2d 367 (Vt. 1997). · cites it 2× “, 21 V.S.A. §§ 642, 646, defendant has chosen to provide those employees with light-duty work at full pay.”
Morin v. Essex Optical/The Hartford, 2005 VT 15 (Vt. 2005). “” 21 V.S.A. § 642, as amended by 1993, No. 225 (Adj.”
YUSTIN v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 2011 VT 20 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 618(a)(1); see 21 V.S.A. § 642 (limiting, generally, temporary total disability benefits to two-thirds of the employee's average weekly wages).”
Bishop v. Town of Barre, 442 A.2d 50 (Vt. 1982). “Temporary disability benefits are provided for workers who suffer a “disability for work,” 21 V.S.A. §§ 642, 646, during the period between their injury and final recovery.”
Wroten v. Lamphere, 523 A.2d 1236 (Vt. 1987). · cites it 2× “Claimant’s main argument is that during the course of a full-time vocational rehabilitation program, an injured employee receiving workers’ compensation benefits should be considered totally disabled for work and therefore entitled to receive temporary total disability…”
Roethke v. Jake's Original Bar & Grill, 772 A.2d 492 (Vt. 2001). “This is an appeal from a final order by the Commissioner of Labor and Industry, who certified as a question for review by this Court whether a claimant’s workers’ compensation rate pursuant to 21 V.S.A. §§ 642 and 648 (temporary total and permanent partial disability) may exceed…”
Longe v. Boise Cascade Corp., 762 A.2d 1248 (Vt. 2000). “We, however, fail to see how any of those provisions supports claimant.”
Orvis v. Hutchins, 179 A.2d 470 (Vt. 1962). · cites it 2× “21 V.S.A. § 642. Total disability, benefits —"Where the injury causes total disability for work, the employer during such disability, * * * shall pay the injured employee a weekly compensation equal to sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the average weekly wages.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 642(a) — 2 cases
Montgomery v. Brinver Corp., 457 A.2d 644 (Vt. 1983). “§§ 663, 664, claiming that the payments, pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 642(a) and to the agreement, should continue until the disability ended.”
Fleury v. Kessel/Duff Constr. Co., 533 A.2d 1197 (Vt. 1987).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.