Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 1205 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 1205)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2001–2013 · leading case: In Re Dunnett, 776 A.2d 406 (Vt. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Dunnett, 776 A.2d 406 (Vt. 2001). “The environmental court determined that the board’s practice of simply keeping minutes of hearings as opposed to audio or video recordings did not satisfy the requirement that proceedings “be recorded” found in the Municipal Administrative Procedure Act, 24 V.S.A § 1205(c), the…”
Appeal of Walters (Decision & Order on Motions Regarding Transcript) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2004). · cites it 2× “" 24 V.S.A. § 1205. In the present state of technology, such proceedings could be recorded by audio tape or video tape; or onto a computer or recordable compact disk (CD) or digital video disk (DVD); or by a court reporter or stenographer.”
Goddard Coll. CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “For example, 24 V.S.A. § 1205(c) requires that, at a hearing before the appropriate board, the presiding officer “cause the proceeding to be recorded.”
P & R Assocs., LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “Some of MAPA’s procedural protections include the recording of hearings (24 V.S.A. § 1205(c)) and the swearing in of witnesses 24 V.”
Sprague Farms, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “Because the Town had not made provisions to make an audio-taped or other record of the DRB proceedings that would be capable of being transcribed, as required by the Municipal Administrative Procedure Act, 24 V.S.A. § 1205(c), but instead relied on the meetings’ minutes, the…”
Appeal of Tepper (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006). “Thus, the DRB could not have violated the MAPA’s requirements that hearings be recorded, 24 V.S.A. § 1205(c), or that testimony be made under oath, 24 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 1205(c) — 6 cases
In Re Dunnett, 776 A.2d 406 (Vt. 2001). “The environmental court determined that the board’s practice of simply keeping minutes of hearings as opposed to audio or video recordings did not satisfy the requirement that proceedings “be recorded” found in the Municipal Administrative Procedure Act, 24 V.S.A § 1205(c), the…”
Goddard Coll. CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “For example, 24 V.S.A. § 1205(c) requires that, at a hearing before the appropriate board, the presiding officer “cause the proceeding to be recorded.”
P & R Assocs., LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “Some of MAPA’s procedural protections include the recording of hearings (24 V.S.A. § 1205(c)) and the swearing in of witnesses 24 V.”
Sprague Farms, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “Because the Town had not made provisions to make an audio-taped or other record of the DRB proceedings that would be capable of being transcribed, as required by the Municipal Administrative Procedure Act, 24 V.S.A. § 1205(c), but instead relied on the meetings’ minutes, the…”
Appeal of Tepper (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006). “Thus, the DRB could not have violated the MAPA’s requirements that hearings be recorded, 24 V.S.A. § 1205(c), or that testimony be made under oath, 24 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.