Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 3311 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 3311)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1962–2014 · leading case: City of Newport v. Vill. of Derby Ctr., 2014 VT 108 (Vt. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Newport v. Vill. of Derby Ctr., 2014 VT 108 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 6× “” The court further concluded that 24 V.S.A. § 3311, which regulates municipal corporations’ setting of water rates, did not authorize the Village to charge an unused allocation fee, because the term “rate” in the statute only contemplated an unused-water fee based on actual…”
Vermont North Props. v. Vill. of Derby Ctr., 2014 VT 73 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 2× “See 24 V.S.A. § 3311 (1975) (providing, as in current statute, that municipal corporation may “alter, modify, increase, or diminish” water rates from time to time, and may “extend them to any description of property or use as such municipal corporation may deem proper”); id.”
West v. Vill. of Morrisville, 563 F. Supp. 1101 (D. Vt. 1983). “” Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment at 19 (citing Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 24, § 3311.) Although this section, dealing with the powers of municipal water works, does make such a distinction, this does not alter the fact that the charters and the…”
In Re Dixon, 183 A.2d 522 (Vt. 1962). “The village has cited a number of acts of the legislature, notably 24 V.S.A. §3311, as well as charter provisions, the clear import of which is that the water rates are a matter for the village’s determination and not that of the public service board.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.