Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 2923 (2026)

Rate of return

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 30 V.S.A. § 2923)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1976–1983 · leading case: In Re Vill. of Hardwick Elec. Dep't, 466 A.2d 1180 (Vt. 1983).
In Re Vill. of Hardwick Elec. Dep't, 466 A.2d 1180 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 2× “In its appeal, petitioner contends (1) that the Board misconstrued 30 V.S.A. § 2923 when it established the rate of return allowed to petitioner, (2) that the Board failed to make adequate findings of fact, and (3) that the Board erred in ordering refunds to be made prior to the…”
In Re Vill. of Stowe Elec. Dep't, 367 A.2d 1056 (Vt. 1976). · cites it 2× “The Board allowed a rate of return on equity by treating retained earnings as capital investment.”
In Re Petition of Burlington Elec. Light Dept., 373 A.2d 514 (Vt. 1977). · cites it 2× “30 V.S.A. § 2923(a) allows municipals a rate of return commensurate with that granted private utilities.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 2923(a): 2 cases
In Re Petition of Burlington Elec. Light Dept., 373 A.2d 514 (Vt. 1977). “30 V.S.A. § 2923(a) allows municipals a rate of return commensurate with that granted private utilities.”
In Re Vill. of Stowe Elec. Dep't, 367 A.2d 1056 (Vt. 1976). “The Board allowed a rate of return on equity by treating retained earnings as capital investment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.