Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 10002 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 10002)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2024 · leading case: Chamberlin v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 632 A.2d 1103 (Vt. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Chamberlin v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 632 A.2d 1103 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 4× “The Vermont Department of Taxes appeals from a judgment that taxpayers substantially conformed to the requirements of the builder's exemption to the land gains tax, see 32 V.S.A. § 10002(f), by preparing a parcel of land for the installation of a modular home by the purchaser of…”
Dep't of Taxes v. Murphy, 2005 VT 84 (Vt. 2005). “In 1995, taxpayers filed a land gains tax return claiming the principal residence exemption pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 10002(b), under the assumption that they would occupy the property no later than two years after the closing date.”
Murphy v. Dep't of Taxes, 795 A.2d 1131 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 2× “In the fall of 1996, the Department contacted taxpayers to determine whether taxpayers had occupied the property within two years and consequently met the requirements for the’ principal residence exception to the land gains and property transfer taxes.”
murphy v. dot (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “See 32 V.S.A. § 10002(b). By this provision of the law, a seller who subdivides raw land can sell to a purchaser who intends to construct a private residence, and shift to the purchaser the risk of meeting the two-year deadline.”
State v. Zinn, 552 A.2d 413 (Vt. 1988). “However, since the purchasers certified that they would complete and occupy a principal residence within two years, under 32 V.S.A. § 10002(b) the transaction was not then taxed.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 10002(b) — 4 cases
Dep't of Taxes v. Murphy, 2005 VT 84 (Vt. 2005). “In 1995, taxpayers filed a land gains tax return claiming the principal residence exemption pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 10002(b), under the assumption that they would occupy the property no later than two years after the closing date.”
Murphy v. Dep't of Taxes, 795 A.2d 1131 (Vt. 2001). “In the fall of 1996, the Department contacted taxpayers to determine whether taxpayers had occupied the property within two years and consequently met the requirements for the’ principal residence exception to the land gains and property transfer taxes.”
murphy v. dot (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “See 32 V.S.A. § 10002(b). By this provision of the law, a seller who subdivides raw land can sell to a purchaser who intends to construct a private residence, and shift to the purchaser the risk of meeting the two-year deadline.”
State v. Zinn, 552 A.2d 413 (Vt. 1988). “However, since the purchasers certified that they would complete and occupy a principal residence within two years, under 32 V.S.A. § 10002(b) the transaction was not then taxed.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 10002(f) — 1 case
Chamberlin v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 632 A.2d 1103 (Vt. 1993). “The Vermont Department of Taxes appeals from a judgment that taxpayers substantially conformed to the requirements of the builder's exemption to the land gains tax, see 32 V.S.A. § 10002(f), by preparing a parcel of land for the installation of a modular home by the purchaser of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.