Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 32 Chapter 131
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 4465 (2026)

Appointment of property valuation hearing officer; oath; pay

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : TO DIRECTOR OR TO SUPERIOR COURT

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 4465)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1972–2009 · leading case: Barnett v. Town of Wolcott, 2009 VT 32 (Vt. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Barnett v. Town of Wolcott, 2009 VT 32 (Vt. 2009). “See 32 V.S.A. § 4465. ¶ 3. Before the state appraiser, taxpayer presented evidence suggesting that the highest and best use of the property, as of April 1, 2007, was “for sale as an incomplete development and that the fair market value for that use was $153,000.”
Alexander v. Town of Barton, 565 A.2d 1294 (Vt. 1989). “See 32 V.S.A. § 4465. Before the Board, the Alexanders challenged the selective reappraisal, arguing that it violated chapter I, article 9 of the Vermont Constitution.”
Saufroy v. Town of Danville, 538 A.2d 168 (Vt. 1987). “The taxpayers appealed to the Director of the Division of Property Valuation and Review, who empaneled a Board of Appraisers to hear the appeal pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 4465. After taking evidence from the taxpayers and from representatives of the town and viewing the property…”
LITTLEFILED v. Town of Brighton, 563 A.2d 998 (Vt. 1989). “32 V.S.A. § 4465. After a hearing, the Board set the fair market value of the taxpayers’ property at $44,800 ($12,700 for the land and $32,100 for the buildings).”
Kachadorian v. Town of Woodstock, 545 A.2d 509 (Vt. 1988). “32 V.S.A. §§ 4465, 4467. The Board found that the taxpayers’ property should be listed at $122,000.”
Town of Barnet v. New England Power Co., 296 A.2d 228 (Vt. 1972). “On the other hand it is New England Power Company’s position that based upon the restrictions and conditions placéd upon the-property by the Federal Power Act and by the Federal Power' Commission the Board was justified in finding as a matter of judgment-the fair market value of…”
Hoefer v. Town of Brattleboro, 407 A.2d 183 (Vt. 1979). “The Board of Appraisers appointed by the Director under 32 V.S.A. § 4465 conducted a de novo hearing, issued findings, and reduced the appraised fair mar *435 ket value to $54,900.”
Heindel v. Town of Grafton, 435 A.2d 695 (Vt. 1981). “§ 4461(a), and after hearing by the State Appeals Board, 32 V.S.A. § 4465 et seq., the appraisal was reduced to $35,900.”
Amodeo v. Town of Readsboro, 401 A.2d 902 (Vt. 1979). “32 V.S.A. § 4465. The Board in a de novo proceeding heard each case, made findings of fact, and determined the correct valuation of the property as required by 32 V.”
Appeal of Hughes, 318 A.2d 676 (Vt. 1974). “The Commissioner of Taxes referred the matter to the State Board of Tax Appeals, appointed by the Commissioner of Taxes, pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 4465 (Supp. 1973). The State Board of Tax Appeals reduced the 1972 valuations of the two camps to the total amount of $11,981.”
Town of Barnet v. New England Power Co., 291 A.2d 396 (1972). “An appeal was taken to the Commissioner of Taxes and acting under the provisions of 32 V.S.A. § 4465 referred to the State Board of Tax Appraisers for its appraisal and report.”
Mt. Mansfield Television, Inc. v. Town of Stowe, 407 A.2d 172 (Vt. 1979). “The Director appointed a board of appraisers under 32 V.S.A. § 4465, and the Board conducted a de novo hearing and issued findings as required by 32 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.