Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 5866 (2026)

Supplemental information; changes in federal tax liability or taxable income

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 006 : RETURNS

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 5866)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2008–2008 · leading case: TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Dep't of Taxes, 2008 VT 120 (Vt. 2008).
TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Dep't of Taxes, 2008 VT 120 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 3× “Taxpayer’s 2000 and 2001 BFT filings were finalized only after the taxpayer computed its adjusted federal income tax, determined it was due a refund from the state based on a comparison of what it had paid with its federal tax, and notified the Department (via its 2002 and 2003…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 5866(a) — 1 case
TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Dep't of Taxes, 2008 VT 120 (Vt. 2008). “Taxpayer’s 2000 and 2001 BFT filings were finalized only after the taxpayer computed its adjusted federal income tax, determined it was due a refund from the state based on a comparison of what it had paid with its federal tax, and notified the Department (via its 2002 and 2003…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 5866(a)(1) — 1 case
TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Dep't of Taxes, 2008 VT 120 (Vt. 2008). “Taxpayer’s 2000 and 2001 BFT filings were finalized only after the taxpayer computed its adjusted federal income tax, determined it was due a refund from the state based on a comparison of what it had paid with its federal tax, and notified the Department (via its 2002 and 2003…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 5866(b) — 1 case
TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Dep't of Taxes, 2008 VT 120 (Vt. 2008). “Taxpayer’s 2000 and 2001 BFT filings were finalized only after the taxpayer computed its adjusted federal income tax, determined it was due a refund from the state based on a comparison of what it had paid with its federal tax, and notified the Department (via its 2002 and 2003…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.