Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 32 Chapter 219
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 8911 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 8911)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1983–2017 · leading case: Williams v. State, 589 A.2d 840 (Vt. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Williams v. State, 589 A.2d 840 (Vt. 1990). · cites it 2× “They also argue, in an effort to avoid the conclusion that the new rule has rendered their equal protection challenge moot, that the rule contradicts legislative intent and the plain meaning of 32 V.S.A. § 8911(9). In his complaint and on appeal, Woodard also requests a…”
N. Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Conway, 464 A.2d 750 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 4× “Further proof that the legislature was well aware of the definition and the restrictive class of taxpayer thereby entitled to purchase and use tax relief is found in the 1982 amendment to 32 V.S.A. § 8911 (10). As now amended, the exemption applies to transfers between a…”
Leverson v. Conway, 481 A.2d 1029 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 2× “The Legislature has chosen to grant certain exemptions from the purchase and use tax, see 32 V.S.A. § 8911 (1)-(13); all nonexempt persons must pay the four percent tax.”
Greg R. Barringer Judith M. Barringer v. Michael D. Griffes, 964 F.2d 1278 (2d Cir. 1992). “32 Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 32, § 8911(9) (1981). 2 .”
Murray v. McDonald, 988 F. Supp. 420 (D. Vt. 1997). “Certain vehicles and transfers of ownership are exempt from the tax. § 8911.”
Pawa v. McDonald, 921 F. Supp. 227 (D. Vt. 1996). · cites it 9× “Background The plaintiff asks this Court to declare the exemption from payment of motor vehicle use tax provided by 32 V.S.A. § 8911(8) unconstitutional as discriminatory against residents who receive gift vehicles from family members who are not Vermont residents.”
In re Bourbeau Custom Homes, Inc., 171 A.3d 40 (Vt. 2017). “2d 750 (1983), the single issue on appeal was whether the word "individual" included corporations under 32 V.S.A. § 8911(10), a statute that granted certain qualified "individuals" an exemption for a purchase and use tax on motor vehicle transfers.”
Murray v. McDonald, 157 F.3d 147 (2d Cir. 1998). “Acts & Resolves, reprinted in Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 8911 (historical notation) (“Act 223”), insofar as that statute authorized the refund of certain taxes paid, without any refund of interest accrued.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 8911(10) — 2 cases
N. Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Conway, 464 A.2d 750 (Vt. 1983). “Further proof that the legislature was well aware of the definition and the restrictive class of taxpayer thereby entitled to purchase and use tax relief is found in the 1982 amendment to 32 V.S.A. § 8911 (10). As now amended, the exemption applies to transfers between a…”
In re Bourbeau Custom Homes, Inc., 171 A.3d 40 (Vt. 2017). “2d 750 (1983), the single issue on appeal was whether the word "individual" included corporations under 32 V.S.A. § 8911(10), a statute that granted certain qualified "individuals" an exemption for a purchase and use tax on motor vehicle transfers.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 8911(6) — 1 case
Leverson v. Conway, 481 A.2d 1029 (Vt. 1984). “The Legislature has chosen to grant certain exemptions from the purchase and use tax, see 32 V.S.A. § 8911 (1)-(13); all nonexempt persons must pay the four percent tax.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 8911(8) — 1 case
Pawa v. McDonald, 921 F. Supp. 227 (D. Vt. 1996). “Background The plaintiff asks this Court to declare the exemption from payment of motor vehicle use tax provided by 32 V.S.A. § 8911(8) unconstitutional as discriminatory against residents who receive gift vehicles from family members who are not Vermont residents.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 8911(9) — 3 cases
Williams v. State, 589 A.2d 840 (Vt. 1990). “They also argue, in an effort to avoid the conclusion that the new rule has rendered their equal protection challenge moot, that the rule contradicts legislative intent and the plain meaning of 32 V.S.A. § 8911(9). In his complaint and on appeal, Woodard also requests a…”
Greg R. Barringer Judith M. Barringer v. Michael D. Griffes, 964 F.2d 1278 (2d Cir. 1992). “32 Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 32, § 8911(9) (1981). 2 .”
Pawa v. McDonald, 921 F. Supp. 227 (D. Vt. 1996). “Background The plaintiff asks this Court to declare the exemption from payment of motor vehicle use tax provided by 32 V.S.A. § 8911(8) unconstitutional as discriminatory against residents who receive gift vehicles from family members who are not Vermont residents.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.