Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9617 (2026)

Notices; appeals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 9617)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: murphy v. dot (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
murphy v. dot (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “See 32 V.S.A. § 9617(e). Plaintiffs argue that the Tax Department should be estopped from collecting the taxes because of the representations arising out of the communications between the parties pending the plaintiffs’ first appeal.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9617(e): 1 case
murphy v. dot (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “See 32 V.S.A. § 9617(e). Plaintiffs argue that the Tax Department should be estopped from collecting the taxes because of the representations arising out of the communications between the parties pending the plaintiffs’ first appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.