Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 33 Chapter 51
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5124 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 33 V.S.A. § 5124)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2026 · leading case: In re P.K., Juv., 2017 VT 3 (Vt. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re P.K., Juv., 2017 VT 3 (Vt. 2017). · cites it 4× “At a hearing on October 9, 2015, mother voluntarily relinquished her parental rights after entering into a postadoption-contact agreement pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 5124. At the outset of the hearing, the termination agreement, the accompanying affidavit in support of the…”
In re B.K. & L.K., Juveniles, 179 A.3d 758 (Vt. 2017). “See 33 V.S.A. § 5124. We note that 33 V.S.A. § 5113 allows the court to consider new evidence in the context of a modification proceeding.”
In Re R.B., Juv. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “On appeal, mother argues that the family court erred by sustaining the State’s objection to her attorney questioning the foster father as to whether he would consider a post-adoption contract agreement (PACA) pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 5124. In relevant part, parents and intended…”
In Re X.D. & D.D., Juveniles (Vt. 2026). “See 33 V.S.A. § 5124(b)(2)(B). The court also found that allowing mother to withdraw her relinquishment would further delay permanency for the children and contravene one purpose of the juvenile statute.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5124(a) — 1 case
In Re R.B., Juv. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “On appeal, mother argues that the family court erred by sustaining the State’s objection to her attorney questioning the foster father as to whether he would consider a post-adoption contract agreement (PACA) pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 5124. In relevant part, parents and intended…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5124(a)(2) — 1 case
In re P.K., Juv., 2017 VT 3 (Vt. 2017). “At a hearing on October 9, 2015, mother voluntarily relinquished her parental rights after entering into a postadoption-contact agreement pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 5124. At the outset of the hearing, the termination agreement, the accompanying affidavit in support of the…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5124(b)(1)(A) — 1 case
In re P.K., Juv., 2017 VT 3 (Vt. 2017). “At a hearing on October 9, 2015, mother voluntarily relinquished her parental rights after entering into a postadoption-contact agreement pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 5124. At the outset of the hearing, the termination agreement, the accompanying affidavit in support of the…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5124(b)(2)(B) — 1 case
In Re X.D. & D.D., Juveniles (Vt. 2026). “See 33 V.S.A. § 5124(b)(2)(B). The court also found that allowing mother to withdraw her relinquishment would further delay permanency for the children and contravene one purpose of the juvenile statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.