Determining transcript accuracy and hearsay use
Also stated as: Assessing record reliability and transcript completeness
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining transcript accuracy and hearsay use
- Cited for: Value of transcript in credibility determinations
Ranked by how often Virginia courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Virginia opinions citing these pages
- Douglas Allen Daugherty v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 0962112 (Va. Ct. App. May 1, 2012)
- Dawyot v. Catawba Capital Mgmt., Inc., 82 Va. Cir. 521 (Roanoke County Cir. Ct. 2011)
- Anonymous C v. Anonymous B, No. 2232092 (Va. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 2011)
- Brian Conley Cable v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 1960074 (Va. Ct. App. Sept. 15, 2009)
- Malik Corey Brown v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 2825071 (Va. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2009)
- Luginbyhl v. Commonwealth, 618 S.E.2d 347 (Va. Ct. App. 2005)
- Bernice Wilson v. Fairfax Cnty. Dept. Soc. Svc, No. 2606024 (Va. Ct. App. July 15, 2003)
- Robert Michael Baber v. Commonwealth, No. 2832012 (Va. Ct. App. Apr. 8, 2003)
- George Harrison Seymour v. Sharon Lee Seymour, No. 0554012 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2002)
- Malcolm Terrell Bishop v. Commonwealth, No. 2397952 (Va. Ct. App. June 10, 1997)
- Gregory v. Commonwealth, 468 S.E.2d 117 (Va. Ct. App. 1996)
- Jackson v. Commonwealth, 453 S.E.2d 567 (Va. Ct. App. 1995)
- Ellis v. Commonwealth, 444 S.E.2d 12 (Va. Ct. App. 1994)
- Hamm v. Commonwealth, 428 S.E.2d 517 (Va. Ct. App. 1993)
- Clark v. Commonwealth, 421 S.E.2d 28 (Va. Ct. App. 1992)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 39 opinions
- 49 opinions
- 16 opinions
- 6 opinions
Filed under: Admissibility; Recordings; Authenticating
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law